Gvora v. Carlson
| Decision Date | 07 June 1949 |
| Citation | 255 Wis. 118,37 N.W.2d 848 |
| Parties | GVORA v. CARLSON et al. |
| Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Douglas county; Carl H. Daley, Circuit Judge.
Reversed.
Action begun May 20, 1948, by Vincent Gvora against Henry Carlson and the Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance Company to recover damages for personal injuries. From an order granting a new trial, defendants appeal.
Plaintiff, Vincent Gvora, hired defendant, Henry Carlson, to haul some scrap wood from the Y & O Coal Dock in Superior, Wisconsin, on December 2, 1947. The usual gate to the dock was blocked so the parties used a railway gate. In order to gain access to the dock by this gate the truck had to pass over several railroad tracks. Because this route was not used for trucks or cars, there was no planking alongside the tracks. On leaving the dock, the parties had difficulty getting the truck across the tracks because of snow, making the rails wet and slippery. Both engaged in an effort to overcome the difficulty. They placed pieces of wood next to the rail. Then defendant would get into his truck and apply the power slowly with the engine in low gear. Plaintiff stood back-to the rear and at the left of the truck-to watch. Each time the truck would slide to the left toward a gondola railway car which was on the tracks. On the third attempt to cross the tracks, plaintiff's shoulder and upper right arm were pinched between the truck and the railway car.
There is a conflict of testimony on whether defendant told plaintiff when he was going to start the truck. Defendant testified that he only told plaintiff to stand clear on the first attempt but that each time before he started he observed the plaintiff standing at the left and to the rear of the truck. Plaintiff testified that he was given no indication of when the truck would be started.
The jury in a special verdict found: (1) with Juror Hjalmer dissenting, that plaintiff was injured by being squeezed between defendant's truck and the railway car; (2) that defendant was not negligent as to lookout but was negligent as to giving warning; (3) that such negligence was a cause of the accident; (4) with Juror McGettigan dissenting, that plaintiff was not negligent as to lookout and with Juror Ball dissenting, that plaintiff was negligent as to position; (5) with Jurors McGettigan and Ball dissenting, that such negligence was a cause of the accident; (6) with Juror McGettigan dissenting, that plaintiff was forty per cent. negligent and defendant sixty per cent.; and (7) assessed plaintiff's damages at $3600.00.
Since McGettigan dissented on the comparative negligence in question six, Ball on the negligence of plaintiff in question four, and Hjalmer on the injury to the plaintiff in this manner in question one, the trial court on November 20, 1948, ordered a new trial on the ground that only nine of the twelve jurors concurred as to comparative negligence.
Defendant appeals from that order claiming that, as a matter of law, plaintiff is as negligent or more negligent than defendant.
Hughes & Anderson,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wicker v. Hadler, s. 344
...Gilberg v. Tisdale (1961), 13 Wis.2d 249, 255, 108 N.W.2d 515.7 Id. 13 Wis.2d at page 255, 10, N.W.2d at page 517.8 Gvora v. Carlson (1949), 255 Wis. 118, 37 N.W.2d 848.9 John Mohr & Sons, Inc. v. Jahnke (1972), 55 Wis.2d 402, 407, 408, 198 N.W.2d 363.10 Behning v. Star Fireworks Mfg. Co. (......
-
Brunner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie R. Co.
...Wisconsin Electric Power Co., 240 Wis. 87, 2 N.W.2d 856; Dinger v. McCoy Transportation Co., 254 Wis. 447, 37 N.W.2d 26; Gvora v. Carlson, 255 Wis. 118, 37 N.W.2d 848. No more can be read out of the precedents than that each case must be considered upon its peculiar facts." See also Ligman ......
-
Quady v. Sickl
...Wisconsin Electric Power Co., 240 Wis. 87, 2 N.W.2d 856; Dinger v. McCoy Transportation Co., 254 Wis. 447, 37 N.W.2d 26; Gvora v. Carlson, 255 Wis. 118, 37 N.W.2d 848. No more can be read out of the precedents than that each case must be considered upon its peculiar We conclude that from hi......
-
Siblik v. Motor Transport Co.
...throwing the latter to ascertain whether they had 'fouled' one with the other. As authority they cite such cases as Gvora v. Carlson, 255 Wis. 118, 37 N.W.2d 848, and Lepak v. Farmers Mut. Automobile Ins. Co., 262 Wis. 1, 53 N.W.2d 710. In each of those cases it appeared that plaintiff had ......