Haberle v. Troxell

Docket Number16-2074
Decision Date20 March 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
114 cases
  • Geness v. Cox
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • August 28, 2018
    ...of a public entity, or was subjected to discrimination by any such entity; (4) by reason of his disability." Haberle v. Troxell , 885 F.3d 170, 178-79 (3d Cir. 2018) (brackets omitted); see also 42 U.S.C. § 12132.As for the first two, he sufficiently pleaded that he is a qualified individua......
  • And v. Pittsburgh Pub. Sch., 2:19-cv-00012
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Pennsylvania
    • December 3, 2019
    ...to establish intentional discrimination, the plaintiff must plead facts showing "at least deliberate indifference." Haberle v. Troxell , 885 F.3d 170, 181 (3d Cir. 2018). To plead deliberate indifference, the plaintiff must allege, first, that the defendant school district had "knowledge th......
  • Berardelli v. Allied Servs. Inst. of Rehab. Med.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • August 14, 2018
    ...modifications," and while we have not explicitly held that those terms are synonymous, we have assumed as much. See Haberle v. Troxell , 885 F.3d 170, 181 n.11 (3d Cir. 2018) (using the phrases "reasonable accommodations" and "reasonable modifications" interchangeably as to the ADA); Skinne......
  • Johnson v. City of Phila.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • September 22, 2020
    ...we assume those allegations are true and draw all reasonable inferences from them in the plaintiff's favor. See Haberle v. Troxell , 885 F.3d 170, 174 n.1 (3d Cir. 2018).A. The Johnson Family's DeathMs. Johnson, her son, and her stepfather (here, for convenience, "the Johnson Family") rente......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Policing Under Disability Law.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 73 No. 6, June 2021
    • June 1, 2021
    ...as the encounter here) and that exigent circumstances may shed light on the reasonableness of an officer's actions."); Haberle v. Troxell, 885 F.3d 170, 180 (3d Cir. 2018) ("[P]olice officers may violate the ADA when making an arrest by failing to provide reasonable accommodations for a qua......
  • To remedy police misconduct, federal disability law is more effective than the constitution
    • United States
    • American Criminal Law Review No. 62-4, October 2025
    • October 1, 2025
    ...under the first prong, or that Miami-Dade is a ‘public entity’ under the second prong.”). 120. 42 U.S.C. § 12132. 121. Haberle v. Troxell, 885 F.3d 170, 180 (3d Cir. 2018). 122. Patten v. District of Columbia, 9 F.4th 921, 928 (D.C. Cir. 124. See, e.g., Seremeth v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs Fred......
  • Disability Law and HIV Criminalization.
    • United States
    • Yale Law Journal Vol. 130 No. 6, April 2021
    • April 1, 2021
    ...of San Francisco v. Sheehan, 135 S. Ct. 1765, 1773 (2015) (describing two types of liability under Section 12132); Haberle v. Troxell, 885 F.3d 170, 180 (3d Cir. 2018) ("[Section] 12132 is framed in the alternative and we can look instead to the second phrase, namely, to whether the arreste......