Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply System

Decision Date17 February 1988
Docket NumberNo. 52559-5,52559-5
Citation750 P.2d 254,109 Wn.2d 107
CourtWashington Supreme Court
PartiesFredric HABERMAN, et al, Appellants, v. WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM, et al, Respondents.

It is hereby ordered that the opinion in the above cause, as the same appears at 109 Wash.2d 107, 744 P.2d 1032, be changed as follows:

1. In the sixth line from the bottom of page 116, [2nd column, 10th line from the top of page 1044 of 744 P.2d], the words "and accountants" are deleted.

2. In the twenty-first line from the top of page 117, [2nd column, 7th line from bottom of page 1044 of 744 P.2d], the date "May 17, 1981," is deleted and the date "March 17, 1981," is inserted in its place.

3. In the last line of page 117, [first column, 17 lines from top of page 1045 of 744 P.2d], the words "all Washington" are deleted and the following words are inserted in their place: "the Washington municipal and public utility district".

To continue reading

Request your trial
236 cases
  • Stevens Cnty. v. Stevens Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • November 16, 2021
    ...not part of the formal record when deciding whether to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CR 12(b)(6). Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply System , 109 Wn.2d 107, 120, 744 P.2d 1032, 750 P.2d 254 (1987). The court must view the truth of facts alleged in the complaint and the hypothetica......
  • Mason v. Mason
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • October 19, 2021
    ...not be entitled to relief.’ " Worthington v. Westnet , 182 Wash.2d 500, 505, 341 P.3d 995 (2015) (quoting Haberman v. Wash. Pub. Power Supply Sys. , 109 Wash.2d 107, 121, 744 P.2d 1032, 750 P.2d 254 (1987)). Otherwise, if a superior court considers and does not exclude matters outside the p......
  • Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • August 27, 1992
    ...Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland (1988) 322 N.C. 200, 367 S.E.2d 609, 617 (same); Haberman v. Pub. Power Supply Sys. (1987) 109 Wash.2d 107, 744 P.2d 1032, 1067-1068, modified (1988) 750 P.2d 254 (adopting Restatement rule and rejecting expansive rule of liability "[i]n ......
  • Flower v. TRA Industries, Inc.
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • March 29, 2005
    ...obtaining or communicating the information." Id. (quoting RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 552(1) (1977); Haberman v. Wash. Pub. Power Supply Sys., 109 Wash.2d 107, 161-62, 744 P.2d 1032, 750 P.2d 254 (1987)). ¶ 26 Huntwood claims that Mr. Flower cannot show that any alleged false representa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
25 books & journal articles
  • §15.6 Analysis
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 15 Rule 15.Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
    • Invalid date
    ...to support a denial of amotion to amend. Haberman v. Wash. Pub. Power Supply Sys., 109 Wn.2d 107, 174, 744 P.2d 1032 (1987), as amended, 750 P.2d 254 (1988); Woodward v. City of Spokane, 51 Wn.App. 900, 906, 756 P.2d 156, review denied, 111 Wn.2d 1027 (1988). These cases are discussed more ......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Appellate Practice Deskbook (WSBA) Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...11.5(1) H_______________________________________________ Haberman v. Wash. Pub. Power Supply Sys., 109 Wn.2d 107, 744 P.2d 1032 (1987), 750 P.2d 254 (1988): 12.7(1) Habitat Watch v. Skagit County, 155 Wn.2d 397, 120 P.3d 56 (2005): 21.2, 21.4(4), 21.5, 21.5(2)(c), 21.15(2)(c) Hadley, In re ......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...Haberman v. Wash. Pub. Power Supply Sys., 109 Wn.2d 107, 744 P.2d 1032 (1987), as amended, 750 P.2d 254 (1988): 3.8(2), 4.7(4)(a), 9.6(2), 9.7(2)(a), 15.6(2)(e), 15.6(4)(a), 15.6(4)(b), 15.6(4)(c), 15.6(4)(d), 15.7(9)(b), 15.7(9)(c), 15.7(9)(d), 20.6(1)(c), 20.7(1), 23.1.5, 23.1.6(3), 23.1.......
  • § 12.7 Standard of Review Applied to Specific Rulings: Civil Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Appellate Practice Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 12 Standard of Review
    • Invalid date
    ...122-23, 11 P.3d 726 (2000); Tenore, 136 Wn.2d at 330; Haberman v. Wash. Pub. Power Supply Sys., 109 Wn.2d 107, 120, 744 P.2d 1032 (1987), 750 P.2d 254 (1988); M.H., 162 Wn. App. at 189. CR 12(b)(6) and CR 12(c) motions "should be granted 'sparingly and with care,' and only in the unusual ca......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT