Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Co
Decision Date | 01 March 1920 |
Docket Number | 23659 |
Citation | 146 La. 897,84 So. 197 |
Court | Louisiana Supreme Court |
Parties | HADDAD v. COMMERCIAL MOTOR TRUCK CO |
Rehearing Denied April 5, 1920
Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; J. R Land, Judge.
Proceedings under the Employers' Liability Law by Mrs. Osie Haddad to recover for the death of her husband, opposed by the Commercial Motor Truck Company, employer. From a judgment sustaining an exception of no cause of action after a trial on the merits, plaintiff appeals.
Reversed and remanded, with directions.
Murff & Mabry, of Shreveport, for appellant.
Wise, Randolph, Rendall & Freyer, of Shreveport, for appellee.
O'NIELL, J.
OPINION
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment sustaining an exception of no cause of action, after a trial on the merits in this case. The exception had formerly been overruled by another judge of the same court, prior to the trial on the merits.
The action was brought under the Employers' Liability Law, and the petition alleges that the husband of plaintiff was killed while in the discharge of his duties,
Defendant admits the employment of the deceased, but denies that it is engaged in any of the businesses mentioned or contemplated by the employers' liability statute, or that the said Haddad was performing any service which fell within that category.
Opinion -- Exception of No Cause of Action.
The question of whether or not the petition discloses a cause of action, depends upon the interpretation to be given to the following sentence of subdivision (a) of paragraph 2 of section 1 of Act No. 20 of 1914, to wit:
The petition alleges, in addition to the nature of the work which the deceased was performing at the time of his death:
"That her said husband was an employ of the Commercial Motor Truck Company prior to and at the time of his death; said company is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Louisiana, domiciled at Shreveport, Louisiana, with W. H. Jordan as president; said M. G. Haddad having worked for said company or corporation for some time as a driver of motortrucks, selling and delivering same, and performing any other duties he was called on to do in connection with said company's motortruck business."
The effect of this and the other allegations of the petition is to charge that the defendant was engaged in the handling, selling, operation, and delivery of motortrucks, and the issue therefore is as to whether or not it was operating "engines" or "other forms of machinery," within the meaning and contemplation of the clause of the statute above quoted.
We think we may take cognizance of the fact that motortrucks are operated or propelled by gasoline engines or motors, which by the use of gasoline produce their own energy or motive power. The driving of such motortrucks necessarily involves the operation of such engines.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Edwards v. Louisiana Forestry Com'n
... ... the United States Supreme Court with approval in the O'Leary case, a truck driver returning to his employer's yard after delivering coal was fatally ... 93, 47 So. 413; Parks v. Hughes, 145 La. 221, 82 So. 202 and Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Co., 146 La. 897, 84 So. 197, 9 A.L.R. 1380 ... ...
-
Plick v. Toye Bros. Auto & Taxicab Co., Inc.
... ... and a truck owned by Tusa Bros.; that they were dependent ... upon their son for ... act as chauffeur or driver of a motor vehicle of any kind ... operated for a fee, charge, profit, or reward, ... The Supreme Court of ... this state, in the case of Haddad vs. Commercial Motor ... Truck Co., 146 La. 897, 84 So. 197, 9 A.L.R ... ...
-
Allen v. Travelers Ins. Co.
... ... customers all of which necessitates his frequent contact with such motor vehicles and his working in close proximity thereto (it is not alleged, ... The question of whether operation of a two-wheeled hand truck or 'dolly' falls within the category of services hazardous in nature ... 'Ever since the decision of this court in the case of Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Co., 146 La. 897, 84 So. 197, 9 A.L.R. 1380, a ... ...
-
Fontenot v. J. Weingarten, Inc.
... ... therein being subjected to the same hazards as those in commercial warehouses. Large fleets of trucks are employed, garaged and maintained ... While operation of motor vehicles for hire is not a named hazardous occupation, certainly the ... 341, 223 So.2d 826 ... * Haddad v. Commercial Truck Co., 146 La. 897, 84 So. 197 (1920); Plick v. Toye ... ...