Haffcke v. Clark
Decision Date | 25 May 1892 |
Docket Number | 4. |
Citation | 50 F. 531 |
Parties | HAFFCKE v. CLARK. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Maryland.
The specification contains the following statements:
I disclaim the use of combined ice and salt in a frigerating chamber, as also an exposed body of chloride of calcium.'
The claims alleged to be infringed are as follows:
Price & Steuart, (Arthur Steuart, of counsel,) for appellant.
Albert S. J. Owens, for appellee.
Before GOFF, Circuit Judge, and HUGHES, District Judge.
Charles Haffcke, the appellant in this case, devised and constructed a refrigerator upon a pattern differing in material particulars from any before used. What one witness says of its capacity for preserving meat and other articles liable to decay, for a long time, in a high degree of atmospheric temperature, is corroborated by numerous others. This witness says, in substance, that he has seen meat in perfect preservation, which has been preserved in one of these refrigerators for six weeks, in the hottest summer weather, in a place where heat was reflected on the refrigerator from the street, under the rays of the summer sun. He testifies that meat kept in this refrigerator at a temperature (inside of its chamber) of 38 to 50 degrees, for six weeks, remains in sweet condition; and that it could not have been kept in an ordinary refrigerator in like condition for more than four or five days. He adds that this result is accomplished by the consumption of much less ice than is ordinarily required for such a purpose. An undertaker testifies that a refrigerator constructed on the same principle, but in casket form, has kept a human corpse for 35 days in a condition as perfect at the end of the period as at the death, in a temperature of 52 degrees; whereas, by the means ordinarily used such a body could not be kept longer than 10 days, with a larger consumption of ice. Other extraordinary instances of like preservation of substances liable to decay are proved to have been accomplished by the Haffcke refrigerator, by testimony which leaves no doubt of the exceptional utility and value of this contrivance for the important purposes for which it is designed.
The form of the structure by which these results are produced is in several respects novel. In the upper part of it is a bowl or rack, with open bottom, for the reception of ice. The bottom is formed of two sets of slats, the upper set convex, the lower concave, so arranged that the melting of the ice drips from the convex into the concave set of slats, and is carried off by the latter. The lower slats or troughs may or may not be filled with salt, at the pleasure of the user. The ice bowl or rack is made of smaller dimensions than that part of the chamber of the refrigerator in which it is placed, in order that between it and the walls of the chamber space may be allowed for the free circulation of air. The receptacle for ice, thus described, differs from those in common use in the fact that it does not touch the walls of the refrigerator, and that its bottom is open for the free descent of air, directly from contact with the ice above, into the chamber below.
The second distinguishing feature of the Haffcke refrigerator consists of contrivances for holding quantities of chloride of sodium or salt in the chamber below the ice, in such manner as to permit the cooled air which descends from the ice to pervade and permeate, with the least possible obstruction, these salt depositories, as well as the open space of the lower chamber. The salt depositories just mentioned, called improperly 'hoppers' in the appellant's specifications for the patent,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Supernatural Foods, LLC
...F.2d 1303, 1306 (7th Cir.1972); PPG Indus., Inc. v. Guardian Indus. Corp., 597 F.2d 1090, 1093 (6th Cir.1979); accord, Haffcke v. Clark, 50 F. 531, 536 (4th Cir.1892). 102 See, CFLC, 89 F.3d at 679; Catapult, 165 F.3d at 750. Both CFLC and Catapult expressly confine their holdings to non-ex......
-
Wyoming-Indiana Oil & Gas Co. v. Weston
...ex rel. Walls v. Comm'rs., (Wyo.) 254 P. 491; Words and Phrases, (2nd Series) Vol. 3, 117, 975; Vol. 5, page 269, (2d Series); Haffcke v. Clark, 50 F. 531; Co. v. Co., 272 F. 242, (2nd Cir.). The claim of the plaintiff Wyoming-Indiana Oil & Gas Co. is barred by laches; Taylor v. Salt Creek ......
-
Keystone Type Foundry v. Fastpress Co., 106.
... ... Under ... such circumstances its license expired with the cessation of ... its corporate activity. Haffcke v. Clark, 50 F. 531, ... 1 C.C.A. 570, citing cases. The result is that in our opinion ... plaintiff has the right to sell the machines it had on ... ...
-
Owens Generator Co. v. HJ Heinz Company
...licensee and terminates with the life of the licensee. Thus when the corporation ceased to exist, so did the license. Haffcke v. Clark, 50 F. 531, 536 (C.C.A.4, 1892); Kenyon v. Automatic Instrument Co., 63 F.Supp. 591 Construing the agreement as an assignment of the legal ownership of the ......