Haga v. Blanc & West Lumber Co., Inc.
Decision Date | 05 March 1984 |
Citation | 666 S.W.2d 61 |
Court | Tennessee Supreme Court |
Parties | D. Clyde HAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLANC & WEST LUMBER COMPANY, INC., and Adrian Blanc, Defendants-Appellees. 666 S.W.2d 61 |
C. Douglas Berryhill, Jefferson City, for plaintiff-appellant.
Douglas Dutton, Knoxville, for defendants-appellees; Hodges, Doughty & Carson, Knoxville, of counsel.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff when he fell from a stack of lumber on the business premises of the defendants. The jury returned a verdict for $30,000.00 in favor of the plaintiff and against both defendants which was approved by the trial judge. On appeal to the Court of Appeals, that court in a two-to-one decision, Judge Franks dissenting, reversed the judgment in favor of the plaintiff and directed a verdict for the defendants. We granted discretionary review.
The plaintiff is engaged in the business of constructing residential housing in Jefferson County and on Saturday morning, March 1, 1980, the plaintiff went to defendant Blanc and West Lumber Company in Jefferson City, Tennessee, to purchase two boards, 2" X 10", 14' in length, for which he had an immediate need in his construction business. After placing his order for this lumber in the sales office of the defendant corporation and after making payment for it, he drove his truck, accompanied by Adrian Blanc, a lumber company employee, to the lumber shed a short distance away.
Plaintiff testified that Mr. Blanc measured the lumber and told him that he would have to get his boards off a certain designated stack. The lumber under the shed was stacked in rows, end to end, with spaces between the stacks. The stacks consisted of bundles of a number of boards strapped together. The strapped bundles were stacked, one on top of the other, from the ground or floor up several feet in height.
The plaintiff testified that Mr. Blanc did not make any effort to get the purchased lumber down from the stack nor offer the assistance of another employee, that he, the plaintiff, climbed between two adjacent stacks of lumber to a position where he could reach the purchased boards and proceeded to throw them off the stack onto the ground. Defendant Blanc picked the lumber off the ground and placed it in the plaintiff's truck.
The plaintiff explained that the bands on both the stack from which he had removed the lumber and the adjoining stack were broken and that as he began to descend from the stacks, the boards began to slide, causing him to lose his balance and to fall backwards to the ground receiving serious and disabling back injuries. He stated that if either bundle had been secured he would have been able to maintain his balance and would not have fallen. He further stated that he first noticed that the lumber on the adjoining stack was loose after he had climbed to the top, his attention theretofore having been directed to the stack from which the boards he was purchasing were located.
Mr. Blanc testified that it was dangerous to have persons climbing on loose lumber; that customers did load their own purchases, occasionally, but that it was a practice the company did not deem to be safe but, nevertheless, had not attempted to prohibit or discourage. Normally, bundles of lumber were brought down to the ground with a fork lift prior to the bindings being cut so that no climbing to obtain individual boards would be required. However, the unbound lumber in the instant case was left stacked in order to keep it under the protection of the shed and out of the elements.
Mr. Blanc further testified that he had prior knowledge that the bindings on most of the top bundles under the shed were broken and that he knew prior to the plaintiff's climb on this occasion that the bindings on both the stacks used by the plaintiff to support himself had been broken. However, Mr. Blanc did not warn the plaintiff nor offer any assistance to him.
In his complaint, the plaintiff alleged that the defendants were negligent in removing the bands from the stacks of lumber from which he fell and that the defendant Blanc failed to warn the plaintiff of this condition of the stacks. The defendants denied liability and asserted the defenses of contributory negligence and assumption of risk.
For a restatement of the rule by which we are governed in conducting our review in this case we quote from Crabtree Masonry Co. v. C & R Const., Inc., Tenn., 575 S.W.2d 4 (1978), as follows:
(Citations omitted.) 575 S.W.2d at 5.
Although acknowledging the existence of the rule just stated, the majority of the Court of Appeals, nevertheless, proceeded to re-evaluate the evidence and reach a conclusion contrary to that of the jury and the trial judge respecting the issues of assumption of risk and contributory negligence. Judge Franks, however, dissented and filed a dissenting opinion, the greater portion of which we adopt as our own, to-wit:
"When the evidence is evaluated in the context required of appellate courts, the evidence which the majority considers the basis of its conclusion is neither considered in its strongest legitimate view in favor of the jury verdict nor is the contrary evidence discarded.
* * * "The plaintiff was also asked on cross-examination:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Walker
... ... court in admitting into evidence statements of co-defendants Danny Branam and Ernest J. Walker as ... ...
-
McDaniel v. Ritter
...Terry v. Boss Hotels, Inc., 376 S.W.2d 239, 247-51 (Mo.1964). Happily, Tennessee law appears the same. 12 Haga v. Blanc & West Lumber Co., 666 S.W.2d 61, 65 (Tenn.1984); Ellithorpe v. Ford Motor Co., 503 S.W.2d 516, 522 (1973); Rogers v. Garrett, 217 Tenn. 282, 287, 397 S.W.2d 372 (1965). W......
-
Perez v. McConkey
...gravity of the danger, and voluntary exposure to the danger. 11 Tennessee courts have adopted this analysis. See Haga v. Blanc & West Lumber Co., 666 S.W.2d 61, 65 (Tenn.1984); Ellithorpe v. Ford Motor Co, 503 S.W.2d 516, 522 (Tenn.1973); Rogers v. Garrett, 217 Tenn. 282, 397 S.W.2d 372 (19......
-
Knapp v. Holiday Inns, Inc.
...v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753, 758-59 (2d Cir.1955).11 A similar standard has been applied to summary judgments. Haga v. Blanc & West Lumber Co., 666 S.W.2d 61, 65 (Tenn.1984); Executone of Memphis, Inc. v. Garner, 650 S.W.2d 734, 736 (Tenn.1983); and Prescott v. Adams, 627 S.W.2d 134, 138-39 ......