Hagan v. Varney
Decision Date | 27 October 1893 |
Citation | 147 Ill. 281,35 N.E. 219 |
Parties | HAGAN et ux. v. VARNEY et al. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Error to Champaign county court.
Bill by George W. Varney and others against John Hagan and Amelia Hagan to enforce a trust. Complainants obtained a decree. Defendants bring error. Affirmed.J. L. Ray and J. S. Wolfe, for plaintiffs in error.
E. L. Sweet, for defendants in error.
The other facts fully appear in the following statement by BAILEY, J.:
This was a bill in chancery, brought by George W. Varney and five others, children of Lydia M. Varney and Bowman Varney, her husband, against John Hagan and Amelia Hagan, his wife, to assert the equitable title of the complainants to a certain tract of land in Champaign county, and to compel a conveyance of the same from the defendants to them. The facts disclosed by the pleadings and proofs are, in substance, these: On the 25th day of February, 1868, Lucy J. Varney, the stepmother of Bowman Varney, being the owner in fee of the land in question, executed and delivered to Lydia M. Varney the following deed conveying the same: On the 28th day of March, 1868, this deed was duly recorded in the office of the recorder of Champaign county. Shortly after its execution, Lydia M. Varney and her husband moved upon the land conveyed, and made it their residence and homestead. While in possession, they placed upon the land certain buildings and other improvements; and subsequently, in a mechanic's lien proceeding,-to which Lydia M. and Bowman Varney were parties, but to which their children, the present complainants, were not parties,-a decree was rendered establishing a lien against the land, and ordering it to be sold for the satisfaction thereof. Under that decree the land was sold, and a master's deed was afterwards executed to the petitioning creditors. To obtain a reconveyance of the land, Lydia M. Varney and husband negotiated and obtained a loan of money, and, to secure the same, executed a mortgage on the land. When that mortgage matured, they paid it by obtaining another loan, and executing a new mortgage therefor; and that mortgage was paid, after its maturity, by obtaining a further loan from still other parties, and the execution of a third mortgage on the land. This last mortgage was for $900. Some time in March, 1885, the defendants, John Hagan and wife, having a little money, and desiring to purchase a small piece of land, learned that the land in question was for sale. They thereupon called upon Lydia M. Varney and her husband, with a view of purchasing it; and negotiations were entered upon which resulted in an agreement by Lydia M. Varney and husband to sell the land to the defendants, they agreeing to pay therefor the money they then had, being about $1,500, and to assume the payment of the $900 mortgage. The vendors were to furnish an abstract of title, which they did; the deed from Lucy J. Varney to Lydia M. Varney being described therein simply as a warranty deed, executed in consideration of $1; no reference being made to any of the conditions therein contained, or the trusts therein declared. The abstract was submitted to an examiner, who reported that the title thereby shown in Lydia M. Varney was a perfect title in fee simple; and thereupon the purchase was consummated by a conveyance of the land from Lydia M. Varney and husband to Amelia and John Hagan by deed with full covenants of warranty, and by the payment by the purchasers to the vendors of the cash payment, and the assumption of the mortgage, which the purchasers afterwards paid and satisfied. The price thus paid seems to have been, at that time, the fair cash value of the land. Lydia M. Varney died June 6, 1888, and Bowman Varney died in March, 1891. On the 23d day of April, 1891, the present bill was filed, two of the complainants then being adults, and the others being still minors. The case was...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wilson v. Harrold
...kind rather than the reasoning in other jurisdictions. Counsel for appellants relies on the reasoning of this court in Hagan v. Varney, 147 Ill. 281, 35 N. E. 219, as tending to uphold his argument that a trust was here created. The wording of the instrument there construed is entirely diff......
-
ZARING v. LOMAX
...as though he was the original life tenant. Prettyman v. Walston, 34 Ill. 175; Little v. Edwards, 84 Wis. 649, 55 N.W. 43; Hagan v. Varney, 147 Ill. 281, 35 N.E. 219; Rich v. Allen, supra. The rule has been stated as follows: 'When an estate for life and a future interest exist in the same l......
-
Weigel v. Green
... ... 175;Waldo v. Cummings, 45 Ill. 421. Nor does it make any difference that certain improvements were made by the appellant upon the property. In Hagan v. Varney, 147 Ill. 281, at page 292, 35 N. E. 219 at page 222, we said: Nor can a life tenant, by placing permanent improvements on the land, ... ...
-
Dee v. Dee
...umequivocal in character should be used, from which an intention to raise a trust can be attributed to the testator. Hagan v. Varney, 147 Ill. 281, 35 N. E. 219. After a careful examination of the various provisions of this will, read in the light of the testator's environments, his conditi......