+-------------------+
¦TABLE OF CONTENTS ¦
+-------------------¦
¦ ¦
+-------------------+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦I. ¦INTRODUCTION ¦1030 ¦
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦A. ¦Factual Background ¦1030 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦Siouxland ¦1031 ¦
+----+----+----+------------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦2. ¦Expansion of Siouxland ¦1031 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a. ¦South Dakota ¦1032 ¦
+----+----+---+----+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦b. ¦Minnesota ¦1032 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦3. ¦Hagen's behavior ¦1032 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a. ¦Prior behavior concerns ¦1033 ¦
+----+----+---+----+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦b. ¦Hagen's behavior at Siouxland and St. Luke's ¦1033 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦4. ¦Applications for medical licensure ¦1034 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a. ¦Wisconsin application ¦1035 ¦
+----+----+---+----+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦b. ¦Minnesota application ¦1035 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦5. ¦Hospital Incident on November 5, 2009 ¦1037 ¦
+----+----+----+------------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦6. ¦Termination ¦1038 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦B. ¦Procedural Background ¦1041 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
+-----+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
¦II. ¦MOTION TO STRIKE ¦1041 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦A. ¦Standards For Motion To Strike ¦1042 ¦
+----+----+----------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
¦ ¦B. ¦Analysis ¦1042 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
+------+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
¦III. ¦MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ¦1043 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦A. ¦Summary Judgment Standards ¦1043 ¦
+----+----+----------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
¦ ¦B. ¦The Licensure Application Claims ¦1044 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦Whether Siouxland, Eastman, Hunt, and Aldrich ratified Lief's actions in completing Hagen's licensure applications ¦1044 ¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a. ¦Arguments of the parties ¦1044 ¦
+----+----+---+----+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦b. ¦Analysis ¦1045 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦2. ¦Fraudulent misrepresentation ¦1045 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a. ¦Arguments of the parties ¦1045 ¦
+----+----+---+----+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦b. ¦Analysis ¦1045 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦3. ¦Conspiracy to defraud ¦1046 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a. ¦Arguments of the parties ¦1046 ¦
+----+----+---+----+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦b. ¦Analysis ¦1046 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦4. ¦Forgery ¦1046 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a. ¦Arguments of the parties ¦1046 ¦
+----+----+---+----+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦b. ¦Analysis ¦1047 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦5. ¦Promissory estoppel ¦1047 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a. ¦Arguments of the parties ¦1048 ¦
+----+----+---+----+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦b. ¦Analysis ¦1048 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦6. ¦Tortious interference with prospective business advantage ¦1048 ¦
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a. ¦Arguments of the parties ¦1048 ¦
+----+----+---+----+--------------------------------------------------+------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦b. ¦Analysis ¦1049 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦C. ¦The Termination Claims ¦1050 ¦
...