Haggard v. State
| Decision Date | 12 March 1901 |
| Docket Number | 3,211 |
| Citation | 59 N.E. 1135,26 Ind.App. 695 |
| Parties | HAGGARD v. THE STATE |
| Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.
Affirmed.
J. F. Hanly, W. R. Wood, R. O. Hawkins and H. E. Smith, for appellant.
C. E. Thompson, D. E. Storms and W. L. Taylor, Attorney-General, for State.
OPINION
The sole question for decision as presented by the record before us is, in all essential respects, identical to that decided in the case of Marmont v. State,48 Ind. 21, and upon the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
Angel v. State
...N.E.2d 514 Croney v. State, 1969 (252 Ind. 319), 247 N.E.2d 501 Coffer v. State, 1959, 239 Ind. 22, 154 N.E.2d 371 Haggard v. State, 1901, 26 Ind.App. 695, 59 N.E. 1135.' 'DEFENDANT'S Defendant would object to State's Instruction No. 1 for the following reasons: No. 1: It doesn't adequately......
-
Givens v. State
... ... 567] law and thwart the legislative will. * * * we are ... entirely satisfied that the transaction * * * amounted to a ... sale in violation of the law." ... The ... above opinion has never been questioned nor overruled. It was ... followed in Haggard v. State (1901), 26 ... Ind.App. 695, 59 N.E. 1135. It has been cited with approval ... by courts in other jurisdictions, in the following cases: ... People v. Soule (1889), 74 Mich. 250, 41 ... N.W. 908, 2 L. R. A. 494; State v. Horacek ... (1889), 41 Kan. 87, 21 P. 204, 3 L. R. A. 687; State ... ...
-
Givens v. State
...to a sale in violation of the law.” The above opinion has never been questioned nor overruled. It has followed in Haggard v. State (1901) 26 Ind. App. 695, 59 N. E. 1135. It has been cited with approval by courts in other jurisdictions, in the following cases: People v. Soule (1889) 74 Mich......
-
Sanchez v. State, 1269S311
...The felonious intent may be properly presumed. 22 C.J.S. Criminal Law § 118; Marmont v. State (1874), 48 Ind. 21; Haggard v. State (1901), 26 Ind.App. 695, 59 N.E. 1135. The defendant offered no evidence or legal authority for such possession, but only attempted to convince the court that h......