Hairston v. Idaho
| Decision Date | 25 February 2008 |
| Docket Number | No. 07–5634.,07–5634. |
| Citation | 552 U.S. 1227,170 L.Ed.2d 272,128 S.Ct. 1442,76 USLW 3454 |
| Parties | James H. HAIRSTON, petitioner, v. IDAHO. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Case below, 144 Idaho 51, 156 P.3d 552.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Idaho. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Supreme Court of Idaho for further consideration in light of Danforth v. Minnesota, 552 U.S. ––––, 128 S.Ct. 1029, 169 L.Ed.2d 859 (2008).
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Stuart v. State Of Idaho
...Creech v. State, 137 Idaho 573, 575, 51 P.3d 387, 389 (2002)) judgment vacated on other grounds sub nom. Hairston v. Idaho, 552 U.S. 1227, 128 S.Ct. 1442, 170 L.Ed.2d 272 (2008). Stuart raises questions of statutory construction as well as the state and federal constitutionality of I.C. § 1......
-
Hairston v. State
...Danforth v. Minnesota, 552 U.S. 264, 128 S.Ct. 1029, 169 L.Ed.2d 859 (2008), but only as to the Ring claim. Hairston v. Idaho, 552 U.S. 1227, 128 S.Ct. 1442, 170 L.Ed.2d 272 (2008). The district court dismissed Hairston's claim seeking to vacate his death sentence. Hairston's case was conso......
-
Hairston v. Blades
... JAMES H. HAIRSTON, Petitioner, v. RANDY BLADES, Warden, Respondent. Case No. 1:00-cv-00303-BLW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO August 16, 2016 CAPITAL CASE MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted Respondent's motion for a limited remand ( see Dkt. 209), to permit the District Court to reconsider the certified aspect of Claim 21 in light of Martinez v ... Ryan , 132 ... ...