Hajjiri v. First Minnesota Sav. Bank F.S.B.
Decision Date | 31 May 1994 |
Docket Number | No. 93-2886,93-2886 |
Citation | 25 F.3d 677 |
Parties | Bassam HAJJIRI; Roxanne L. Hajjiri, Appellants, v. FIRST MINNESOTA SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B.; Norwest Corporation, a Delaware corporation; Norwest Savings Bank, F.S.B.; Norwest Holding Company; Norwest National Bank; Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A., Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Mary C. Ivory, St. Paul, MN, argued (Michael K. Hoverson, Richard Nadler, and Thomas Lyon, on the brief), for appellant.
Charles F. Webber, Minneapolis, MN, argued (Steven Severson, on the brief), for appellee.
Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, LIVELY, * Senior Circuit Judge, and FAGG, Circuit Judge.
The district court dismissed Bassam and Roxanne L. Hajjiri's diversity lawsuit because the Hajjiris failed to commence their action before the applicable six-year Minnesota statute of limitations expired. See Minn.Stat. Sec. 541.05 (1992). The Hajjiris appeal and we affirm.
The parties agree the statute of limitations expired on January 8, 1993, but dispute whether the Hajjiris' service by mail commenced their action before that date. We apply Minnesota law to decide when the Hajjiris' action was commenced. See Walker v. Armco Steel Corp., 446 U.S. 740, 752-53, 100 S.Ct. 1978, 1986, 64 L.Ed.2d 659 (1980). Minnesota law provides that the action is commenced at the date of acknowledgment of service if service is made by mail. Minn.R.Civ.P. 3.01(b). The Hajjiris served Norwest Corporation by mail on November 25, 1992, but Norwest Corporation did not return the acknowledgment of service form sent with the complaint. Instead, on December 23, 1992, Norwest Corporation's attorney sent the Hajjiris' attorney a letter stating Norwest Corporation would not acknowledge service because the wrong defendants were named in the lawsuit.
The Hajjiris contend Norwest Corporation's letter satisfied the acknowledgment requirement. We disagree. Federal law governs process service in diversity lawsuits, and authorizes mail service according to state law as well as the federal rule. Gulley v. Mayo Found., 886 F.2d 161, 164 (8th Cir.1989). The only way mail service can be acknowledged under the federal rule or Minnesota law is by return of the enclosed acknowledgment form within twenty days of the mailing. See id. at 165 ( ); Coons v. St. Paul Cos., 486 N.W.2d 771, 774-75 (Minn.Ct.App.1992) ( ). Because Norwest Corporation...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
301 Clifton Place L.L.C v. 301 Clifton Place Condo. Ass'n
...acknowledgment form. Service by mail was therefore not perfected at that time. Minn. R. Civ. P. 3.01; see Hajjiri v. First Minn. Sav. Bank F.S.B., 25 F.3d 677, 678 (8th Cir.1994) (noting that proper service entails return of acknowledgment form within 20 days of mailing) Coons v. St. Paul C......
- U.S. v. Morales
-
Larsen v. Mayo Medical Center
...of process in federal diversity actions is procedural, and therefore, governed by the Federal Rules. See Hajjiri v. First Minn. Sav. Bank F.S.B., 25 F.3d 677, 678 (8th Cir. 1994). Under the Federal Rules, a plaintiff may, among other things, notify the defendant of the commencement of the a......
-
Wussow v. Andor Tech.
...commencement of a lawsuit, service of process is a procedural inquiry, and is governed by federal law. See Hajjiri v. First Minn. Sav. Bank, F.S.B., 25 F.3d 677, 678 (8th Cir. 1994). Where, as here, the plaintiff provides notice of the action and requests that the defendant waive service, t......