Hall, In re

Decision Date16 January 1986
Docket NumberNo. 85-2338,85-2338
Citation228 USPQ 453,781 F.2d 897
PartiesIn re Leo M. HALL. Appeal
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit

John F. Faro, American Hosp. Supply Corp., Miami, Fla., argued, for appellant. With him on brief was Boris Haskell, Arlington, Va.

Fred E. McKelvey, Deputy Sol., U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Arlington, Va., argued, for appellee. With him on brief were Joseph F. Nakamura, Sol. and Michael L. Gellner, Asst. Sol.

Before BALDWIN, Circuit Judge, NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge, and KASHIWA, Circuit Judge. *

BALDWIN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's (PTO) former Board of Appeals, adhered to on reconsideration by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (board), sustaining the final rejection of claims 1-25 of reissue Application No. 343,922, filed January 29, 1982, based principally on a "printed publication" bar under 35 U.S.C. Secs. 102(b). The reference is a doctoral thesis. Because appellant concedes that his claims are unpatentable if the thesis is available as a "printed publication" more than one year prior to the application's effective filing date of February 27, 1979, the only issue is whether the thesis is available as such a printed publication. On the record before us, we affirm the board's decision.

Background

A protest was filed during prosecution of appellant's reissue application which included in an appendix a copy of the dissertation "1,4-a-Glucanglukohydrolase ein amylotylisches Enzym ..." by Peter Foldi (Foldi thesis or dissertation). The record indicates that in September 1977, Foldi submitted his dissertation to the Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy at Freiburg University in the Federal Republic of Germany, and that Foldi was awarded a doctorate degree on November 2, 1977.

Certain affidavits from Dr. Erich Will, who is the director and manager of the Loan Department of the Library of Freiburg University, have been relied upon by the examiner and the board in reaching their decisions. One document, styled a "Declaration" and signed by Dr. Will, states that:

[I]n November 1977 copies of the dissertation FOLDI ... were received in the library of Freiburg University, and in In an August 28, 1981 letter responding to an inquiry from a German corporation, Dr. Will said that the Freiburg University library was able to make the Foldi dissertation "available to our readers as early as 1977."

December 1977 copies of the said dissertation were freely made available to the faculty and student body of Freiburg University as well as to the general public.

The examiner made a final rejection of the application claims. He said: "On the basis of the instant record it is reasonable to assume that the Foldi thesis was available (accessible) prior to February 27, 1979." He also pointed out that there was no evidence to the contrary and asked the appellant to state his "knowledge of any inquiry which may have been made regarding 'availability' beyond that presently referred to in the record." Appellant did not respond.

By letter, the PTO's Scientific Library asked Dr. Will whether the Foldi dissertation was made available to the public by being cataloged and placed in the main collection. Dr. Will replied in an October 20, 1983 letter, as translated:

Our dissertations, thus also the Foldi dissertation, are indexed in a special dissertations catalogue, which is part of the general users' catalogue. In the stacks they are likewise set apart in a special dissertation section, which is part of the general stacks.

In response to a further inquiry by the PTO's Scientific Library requesting (1) the exact date of indexing and cataloging of the Foldi dissertation or (2) "the time such procedures normally take," Dr. Will replied in a June 18, 1984 letter:

The Library copies of the Foldi dissertation were sent to us by the faculty on November 4, 1977. Accordingly, the dissertation most probably was available for general use toward the beginning of the month of December, 1977.

The board held that the unrebutted evidence of record was sufficient to conclude that the Foldi dissertation had an effective date as prior art more than one year prior to the filing date of the appellant's initial application. In rejecting appellant's argument that the evidence was not sufficient to establish a specific date when the dissertation became publicly available, the board said:

We rely on the librarian's affidavit of express facts regarding the specific dissertation of interest and his description of the routine treatment of dissertations in general, in the ordinary course of business in his library.

On appeal, appellant raises two arguments: (1) the Sec. 102(b) "printed publication" bar requires that the publication be accessible to the interested public, but there is no evidence that the dissertation was properly indexed in the library catalog prior to the critical date; and (2) even if the Foldi thesis were cataloged prior to the critical date, the presence of a single cataloged thesis in one university library does not constitute sufficient accessibility of the publication's teachings to those interested in the art exercising reasonable diligence.

OPINION

The "printed publication" bar is found in 35 U.S.C. Sec. 102:

A person shall be entitled to a patent unless--

* * *

* * *

(b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country ... more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States....

The bar is grounded on the principle that once an invention is in the public domain, it is no longer patentable by anyone. In re Bayer, 568 F.2d 1357, 1361, 196 USPQ 670, 675 (CCPA 1978).

The statutory phrase "printed publication" has been interpreted to give effect to ongoing advances in the technologies of data storage, retrieval, and dissemination. In re Wyer, 655 F.2d 221, 226, 210 USPQ 790, 794 (CCPA 1981). Because there are many ways in which a reference may be disseminated...

To continue reading

Request your trial
160 cases
  • Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • 18 Agosto 2012
    ...180 F.3d 1354, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 1999); J.A. LaPorte, Inc. v. Norfolk Dredging Co., 787 F.2d 1577, 1581 (Fed. Cir. 1986); In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897, 898-99 (Fed. Cir. 1986); D.L. Auld Co. v. Chroma Graphics Corp., 714 F.2d 1144, 1147-50 (Fed. Cir. 1983).[DISPUTED] FINAL JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 19......
  • M.I.T. v. Harman Intern. Industries, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • 9 Septiembre 2008
    ...in the art" before the critical date. Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc., 848 F.2d 1560, 1568 (Fed.Cir.1988) (citing In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897, 899 (Fed.Cir.1986); see also In re Wyer, 655 F.2d at 226-27). The "printed publication" determination must be made on a case-by-case basis. Se......
  • Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • 20 Agosto 2012
    ...180 F.3d 1354, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 1999); J.A. LaPorte, Inc. v. Norfolk Dredging Co., 787 F.2d 1577, 1581 (Fed. Cir. 1986); In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897, 898-99 (Fed. Cir. 1986); D.L. Auld Co. v. Chroma Graphics Corp., 714 F.2d 1144, 1147-50 (Fed. Cir. 1983).[DISPUTED] FINAL JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 19......
  • Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc., MICRO-DEVICE
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • 9 Junio 1988
    ...and public accessibility are the keys to the legal determination whether a prior art reference was "published." In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897, 899, 228 USPQ 453, 455 (Fed.Cir.1986); In re Wyer, 655 F.2d 221, 226-27, 210 USPQ 790, 794-95 (CCPA 1981). Intel presented extensive uncontroverted evide......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
  • Proving 'Prior Art' At The PTAB
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 23 Febrero 2016
    ...as the Board noted, "the date stamp showed that the documents were deposited with the Library before the critical date"). 12 In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897, 897 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (allowing, in a proceeding not controlled by the rules of Evidence, "Certain affidavits from Dr. Erich Will, who is the......
  • The Pitfalls Of Public Disclosure: Protecting the Fruits of Your Research
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 16 Febrero 2004
    ...University library was sufficiently available to the relevant interested public to constitute a prior art publication. In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897, 900, 228 USPQ 453 (Fed. Cir. In contrast, a graduate thesis held in a university library was held not to be a prior art publication where, as of t......
  • The PTAB Review - June 2022
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 23 Junio 2022
    ...Paper 39 (Dec. 20, 2019).34 Id. at 9.35 Id. at 9-10 (quoting In re Lister, 583 F.3d 1307, 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2009)) (citing In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897, 898-99 (Fed. Cir. 1986).36 Weber, Inc. v. Provisur Tech., Inc., IPR2020-01557, Paper 67 (Mar. 31, 2022).37 Id. at 25.38 Id.39 Id. at 26.40 Id. a......
  • Examiners May Rely On Incomplete Prior Art References To Establish Obviousness
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 4 Marzo 2014
    ..."relatively obscure documents qualify as prior art so long as the public has a means of accessing them." Id. at 13 (citing In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897, 899 (Fed. Cir. 1986)). The Court held that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding, including a May 1996 date on the Manual's title......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 books & journal articles
  • The PTAB is Not an Article III Court: A Primer on Federal Agency Rule Making
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Landslide No. 10-2, November 2017
    • 1 Noviembre 2017
    ...1361 (C.C.P.A. 1978) (emphasis added). 21. In re Klopfenstein, 380 F.3d 1345, 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2004). 22. Id. at 1350; see also In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897, 898-99 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (“Because there are many ways in which a reference may be disseminated to the interested public, ‘public accessibi......
  • Printed Publications and Persons of Ordinary Skill: Did the PTAB in GoPro v. Contour IP Holding Apply an Overly Restrictive Standard?
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Landslide No. 10-2, November 2017
    • 1 Noviembre 2017
    ...1361 (C.C.P.A. 1978) (emphasis added). 21. In re Klopfenstein, 380 F.3d 1345, 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2004). 22. Id. at 1350; see also In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897, 898-99 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (“Because there are many ways in which a reference may be disseminated to the interested public, ‘public accessibi......
  • Putting the "public" Back in "public Use" Interpreting the 2011 Leahy-smith America Invents Act
    • United States
    • Georgia State University College of Law Georgia State Law Reviews No. 31-4, June 2015
    • Invalid date
    ...Compare 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)-(b) (2006), with 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) (2012). See also Armitage, supra note 127, at 46-47, 51.209. In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897, 897, 899 (Fed. Cir. 1986). This case is commonly thought of as obscure, but at least the thesis was catalogued and potentially accessible. Id......
  • Chapter §7.06 Loss of Right/Statutory Bars Under §102(b)
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Mueller on Patent Law Volume I: Patentability and Validity Title CHAPTER 7 Novelty, No Loss of Right, and Priority [Pre-America Invents Act of 2011]
    • Invalid date
    ...Patent Act of 1836, Ch. 357, 5 Stat. 117, at Sec. 7 (July 4, 1836) (emphasis added).[306] 35 U.S.C. §311(b).[307] See In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897, 898 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (stating that §102(b) printed publication bar "is grounded on the principle that once an invention is in the public domain, it......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT