Hall v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

Decision Date16 March 1960
Docket NumberCiv. A. 12418.
Citation199 F. Supp. 833
PartiesGeorge R. HALL, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE of the United States Government, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas

Musick, Musick & Heath, Ted Musick, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff.

William B. Butler, U. S. Atty., Randolph F. Wheless, Jr., Houston, Tex., for defendant.

HANNAY, Chief Judge.

On the 26th day of November, 1958, plaintiff attempted to bring this suit by filing same against the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare for an award of Social Security benefits which plaintiff alleges was improperly denied by a prior administrative ruling of the department.

The defendant has moved to dismiss this action for the reasons that it claims there is no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action or person of the defendant because the suit is against the sovereign where there is no waiver of immunity.

On August 15, 1959, the plaintiff moved for leave to amend his pleadings to bring in the Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare should it be found that the Secretary is an indispensable party to this action.

Judicial review of the final administrative determinations of claims for old age benefits under 42 U.S.C.A. § 401 et seq. (Federal Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance Benefits) is provided in 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g) and (h). The pertinent parts read as follows:

"(g) Any individual, after any final decision of the Secretary made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision * * *. As part of its answer the Secretary shall file a certified copy of the transcript of the record including the evidence upon which the findings and decision complained of are based. The court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Secretary with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing. The findings of the Secretary as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive * * *.
"(h) The findings and decisions of the Secretary after a hearing shall be binding upon all individuals who were parties to such hearing. No findings of fact or decision of the Secretary shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or governmental agency except as herein provided. No
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers Intern. Union v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Com'n, 81-1687
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • February 26, 1982
    ...F.2d ----, No. 81-1818 (D.C.Cir. February 26, 1982).14 See Cohn v. Federal Security Adm., 199 F.Supp. 884 (W.D.N.Y.1961); Hall v. HEW, 199 F.Supp. 833 (S.D.Tex.1960); Cunningham v. United States, 199 F.Supp. 541 (W.D.Mo.1959).15 See Jacoby, The Effect of Recent Changes in the Law of 'Non-st......
  • Hartke v. Federal Aviation Administration
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • November 2, 1973
    ...v. City of Minneapolis, 286 F.Supp. 614 (D.Minn. 1968) (Dept. of Housing and Urban Development); Hall v. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 199 F. Supp. 833 (S.D.Tex.1960) (Dept. of Health, Education and Plaintiff has not cited, nor has this court's independent research revealed, ......
  • Ro Ane v. Mathews
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • May 16, 1977
    ...v. Folsom, 200 F.Supp. 25 (M.D. Tenn.1959) (plaintiff sued former rather than present Secretary); Hall v. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 199 F.Supp. 833 (S.D.Tex.1960) (plaintiff sued agency rather than Secretary). Therefore, the Court will dismiss all defendants except the Se......
  • Plourde v. US Postal Service
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota
    • September 29, 1989
    ...v. Fed. Sec. Adm., 199 F.Supp. 884, 885 (W.D.N.Y.1961); Cunningham v. United States, 199 F.Supp. 541 (W.D.Mo.1958); Hall v. Dept. of HEW, 199 F.Supp. 833 (S.D.Tex.1960); and Sandridge v. Folsom, Secy. HEW, 200 F.Supp. 25 (M.D.Tenn. 1959). See also Byse, Suing the Wrong Defendant in Judicial......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 provisions
  • 28 APPENDIX U.S.C. § 15 Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
    • United States
    • US Code 2023 Edition Title 28 Appendix Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Title III. Pleadings and Motions
    • January 1, 2023
    ...199 F.Supp. 884, 885 (W.D.N.Y. 1961); see also Cunningham v. United States, 199 F.Supp. 541 (W.D.Mo. 1958); Hall v. Department of HEW, 199 F.Supp. 833 (S.D.Tex. 1960); Sandridge v. Folsom, Secretary of HEW, 200 F.Supp. 25 (M.D.Tenn. 1959). [The Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare ha......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT