Hall v. McKellar
| Decision Date | 23 April 1908 |
| Citation | 46 So. 460,155 Ala. 508 |
| Parties | HALL v. MCKELLAR. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Chancery Court, Lowndes County; L. D. Gardner Chancellor.
Bill by Elizabeth McKellar, as administratrix, etc., against A. B Hall. Decree for complainant, and respondent appeals. Affirmed.
Steiner Crum & Weil, for appellant.
W. P McGaugh and H. S. Houghton, for appellee.
This appeal is from a decree overruling a motion to dismiss for want of equity. All amendable defects being considered as amended, the bill shows that the respondent (appellant) occupied a fiduciary relation to complainant's mother, the intestate, being her agent, managing her estate, consisting of several plantations, for several years, and at the time of her death taking possession of a large portion of her personal property, and that complainant has no means of ascertaining how the accounts of said agency stand, or what personal property has gone into the hands of the respondent, and has made frequent demands for a statement of said accounts and the delivery up of the property in his hands. The bill propounds a number of interrogatories and prays for discovery and an accounting.
In order to give the court jurisdiction, it is only necessary to show either a fiduciary relation between the parties or complication, or that a discovery is necessary. Pollak v. Claflin Co., 138 Ala. 644, 648, 35 So. 645; Halsted v. Rabb, 8 Port. 63; Kirkman v. Vanlier, 7 Ala. 217, 224; Avery v. Ware, 58 Ala. 475; 1 Ency. Pl. & Pr. 96; 4 Pomeroy, Eq. Jur. (3d Ed.) § 1421, and note 3; 6 Pomeroy, Eq. Jur. (2 Eq. Rem.) §§ 931, 932. In the citations just made it is stated that "the mere relation of principal and agent, without more--the relation not being really fiduciary in its nature, and no obstacle intervening to a recovery at law--is insufficient to enable a principal to maintain the action against his agent." Our own cases are referred to--notably, Knotts v. Tarver, 8 Ala. 743, which was a case in which the agency involved one single item, to wit: The agent had purchased a tract of land for the principal, and collected from him $500 more than he had paid for it. The court very properly said: "There is no matter of account between these parties." Page 745. It was simply a liability for the known sum of $500. Also the case of Crothers, Adm'r, v. Lee et al., 29 Ala. 337, which was a case against an attorney for money collected by him, where the court say: "The account consists of a single item on one side, to which the defendant may have offsets or credits." This, too, was a simple matter, about which there was no account to be rendered.
But in the case...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ingram v. People's Finance & Thrift Co. of Alabama, 6 Div. 197.
...Woolbert, supra; Comer v. Birmingham News Company, 218 Ala. 360, 118 So. 806; Tolleson v. Henson, 207 Ala. 529, 93 So. 458; Hall v. McKeller, 155 Ala. 508, 46 So. 460; First Nat. Bank of La Pine v. Bradley, 223 Ala. 134 So. 621. Equity should entertain jurisdiction in accounting, if the fac......
-
Julian v. Woolbert
...v. Vanlier, supra; Knotts v. Tarver, supra; Avery v. Ware, supra; Tecumseh Iron Co. v. Camp, supra; Beggs v. Edison Co., supra; Hall v. McKeller, supra; Halsted v. Rabb, 8 Port. 63; Pollak v. supra; Terrell v. Southern Ry. Co., supra; Metcalf v. Clemmons-Powers & Co., supra; Cullman Prop. C......
-
Nelson Realty Co. v. Darling Shop of Birmingham, Inc.
...But equity may obtain jurisdiction where there is a complication of accounts, or it is shown that a discovery is necessary. Hall v. McKeller, 155 Ala. 508, 46 So. 460. Also, an accounting may always be had in a court of equity, where it is incident to some other relief. Kelly v. Wollner, 20......
-
City of Mobile v. McCown Oil Co.
...v. Woolbert, 202 Ala. 530, 81 So. 32; Birmingham News Company's Case, supra; Tolleson v. Henson, 207 Ala. 529, 93 So. 458; Hall v. McKeller, 155 Ala. 508, 46 So. 460; First Nat. Bank of LaPine v. Bradley, 223 Ala. 134 So. 621; Grand Bay Land Co. v. Simpson, 205 Ala. 347, 87 So. 186; Clevela......