Hall v. Pegram

• Citation: 85 Ala. 522,6 So. 612
• Parties: HALL v. PEGRAM.
• Decision Date: 22 January 1889
• Court: Alabama Supreme Court

6 So. 612

85 Ala. 522

HALL v. PEGRAM.

Supreme Court of Alabama

January 22, 1889

For former opinion, see 5 South. Rep. 209.

STONE, C.J.

Since the decision of this cause on a former day of the term, the counsel in the case, in order to avoid the expense of another reference, but without prejudice to the judgment of this court awarding costs on the reversal, and without prejudice to any other rights which appellant may have in the premises, have filed their written admission that the value of Stoutz's services as accountant is $400, and would be so found and reported by the register; and no exceptions being filed to the report, and it not appearing that the sum reported by the register is too large, save in the item of $500 allowed for the services of said Stoutz, it is ordered and decreed, on motion of counsel for appellee, that the report of the register be so corrected as to show that the sum due from Hall to Pegram is $8,246.64, to bear interest as per the decree of the chancellor and the report of the register, and for such corrected sum the report is confirmed. This in lieu of the sum of $8,646.64, reported by the register. In all other respects the decree of the chancellor is affirmed. The costs of appeal in this court and in the court below stand adjudged against the appellee. All other costs to be paid by appellant.