Hall v. Sroufe
Decision Date | 30 September 1869 |
Citation | 1869 WL 5464,52 Ill. 421 |
Parties | ELIZA HALLv.GEORGE W. SROUFE. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Henry county; the Hon. GEORGE W. PLEASANTS, Judge, presiding.
The opinion states the case.
Messrs. BENNETT & VEEDER, for the appellant.
Mr. M. SHALLENBERGER, for the appellee.
This was an action of replevin, brought by Eliza Hall, against the appellee, who was sheriff of Henry county, to recover possession of two horses which he had levied upon, under an execution against the husband of the plaintiff. The only question is, whether the property belonged to the plaintiff or her husband.
It is urged by appellant, that the circuit court erred in the instructions, and in the admission of evidence. But that portion of the testimony about which there is no controversy, shows such a state of facts as to render a discussion of these questions unnecessary, for even if the instructions were erroneous, the facts proven by the husband of the plaintiff place the correctness of this verdict beyond all question. If it had been for the plaintiff, the court should have set it aside.
The plaintiff claims the horses were bought with her money. The money was a part of eight thousand dollars which was borrowed in January, 1867, from one Libby, in the State of New York, through his agent in Chicago. She gave her individual notes for the money, and a deed of trust on 720 acres of land. This land was the farm which Hall and his family had occupied, by themselves or tenants, for some years, but the legal title of which had been kept in the wife. But Hall himself was put on the stand as a witness, and testified as follows. We quote from the record:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
The Chicago v. Sykes
......Depew, 80 Ill. 119; Ill. Cent. R. R. Co. v. Chambers, 71 Ill. 519; Ill. Cent. R. R. Co. v. Hall, 72 Ill. 222; [1 Ill.App. 523] Snyder v. Hannibal & St. Jo. R. R. Co. 60 Mo. 413; R. R. I. & St. L. R. R. Co. v. Byam, 80 Ill. 528; ......
-
The Vill. of Warren v. Wright
......Stewart, 63 Ill. 332; O'Reiley v. Fitzgerald, 40 Ill. 310; McCarthy v. Mooney, 49 Ill. 247; Young v. Bush, 48 Ill. 42; Neustadt v. Hall, 58 Ill. 172; Presb. Ch. v. Emerson, 66 Ill. 269; Chicago v. Garrison, 52 Ill. 516; Plummer v. Rigdon, 78 Ill. 222; Miller v. Balthasser, 78 Ill. ......
-
Heyer v. Salsbury
......Hall v. Groufe, 52 Ill. 421. CASEY, J. This was an action on the case brought by appellee as administratrix of the estate of ......
-
James v. Johnson
......v. Porter, 92 Ill. 438. The giving of erroneous instructions will not be error, where evidence clearly shows verdict was right: Hall v. Stroufe, 52 Ill. 421. HIGBEE, J. Appellee recovered a judgment against appellants in the court below for alleged ......