Hall v. United States

Decision Date30 October 1893
Docket NumberNo. 822,822
Citation150 U.S. 76,14 S.Ct. 22,37 L.Ed. 1003
PartiesHALL v. UNITED STATES
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

This was an indictment found at August term, 1891, of the circuit court for the western district of Arkansas, against Robert M. Hall, for the murder of James Yates, by shooting him with a gun, at Choctaw nation in the Indian country in that district, on August 4, 1891.

At the trial at August term, 1892, before the district judge it was proved, and not denied, that the defendant, being then 22 years of age, shot and killed Yates at the time and place alleged, and that both were white men. The United States introduced evidence tending to show that the killing was murder, and that the defendant had come from Mississippi, and had been in the Indian country for about four months before the killing. The defendant introduced testimony tending to explain the circumstances of the killing, and to show that it was not murder.

The United States, against the defendant's objection and exception, were permitted by the court, for the purpose of showing that the defendant fled from the Indian country after killing Yates, to put in evidence a warrant issued by a United States judge in Mississippi, dated March 2, 1892, reciting the commitment of the defendant by a United States commissioner 'upon the charge of murder on an indictment from the circuit court of the United States for the western district of Arkansas,' and ordering him to be taken and delivered to the United States marshal for this district.

Witnesses called by the defendant testified that his character as a peaceful and lawabiding man was good. On cross-examination of these witnesses, the district attorney, against the defendant's objection and exception, was permitted by the court, for the purpose of testing their knowledge of his reputation, to ask them whether they had heard that he had killed a negro in Mississippi before he came to the Indian country. The only witness who admitted that he had heard of the killing of the negro by the defendant testified, on re-examination, that he had also heard the he had been acquitted of it.

The defendant, having offered himself as a witness in his own behalf, testified that he went back to Mississippi to stand his trial there in a court of the state in February, 1892, upon a charge of murdering a negro whom he had killed there in August, 1889, and was thereupon arrested, tried, and acquitted upon that charge; and that, immediately after killing the negro, he had left Mississippi by the advice of his father, with whom he then lived. This testimony was not objected to by the district attorney, nor changed on cross-examination.

One exception taken by the defendant was stated in the bill of exceptions allowed by the court as follows:

'The district attorney, in his closing argument to the jury, made use of the following language: 'We know what kind of trials they have in the state of Mississippi of a white man for killing a negro. We know from reading the newspapers and magazines that such trials there are farces. We are not living in Egyptian darkness, but in the light of the nineteenth century. The defendant came from Mississippi with his hands stained with the blood of a negro, and went to the Indian country, and in less than four months had slain another man,'—and other like expressions and declarations that the killing of a negro in Mississippi, for which the defendant had been tried and acquitted there, was murder; to all of which declarations, expressions, and arguments of the district attorney the defendant at the time objected, but his objections were by the court overruled, and the defendant at the time exceted.'

The defendant was convicted of the murder of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
56 cases
  • Perez v. Territory of Arizona
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • 27 Marzo 1908
    ... ... v. State, 101 Ind. 85; State v. Bokien, 14 ... Wash. 403, 44 P. 889; Hall v. United States, 150 ... U.S. 76, 14 S.Ct. 22, 37 L.Ed. 1003; Wilson v. United ... States, 149 ... ...
  • United States v. Woods
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • 12 Septiembre 1973
    ... ... 469, 475-476, 69 S.Ct. 213, 218, 93 L.Ed. 168 ...         In accord are Hall v. United States, 150 U.S. 76, 14 S.Ct. 22, 37 L.Ed. 1003 (1893) and Boyd v. United States, 142 U.S. 450, 12 S.Ct. 292, 35 L.Ed. 1077 (1892). As we previously have stated, this is not merely a technical rule of law; rather, it reflects the "fundamental demand for justice and fairness which lies at ... ...
  • London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Woelfle
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 20 Abril 1936
    ... ... 964; Morris & Co. et al. v. Skandinavia Ins. Co., 279 U.S. 405, 49 S.Ct. 360, 73 L.Ed. 762; United States Merchants' & Shippers' Ins. Co. v. Elder Dempster & Co., Ltd., et al. (C.C.A.2) 62 F.(2d) ... See Hall v. United States, 150 U.S. 76, 81, 14 S.Ct. 22, 37 L.Ed. 1003; Graves v. United States, 150 U.S ... ...
  • State v. Wilson
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 14 Noviembre 1925
    ... ... as null and void in any proceeding. (29 Cyc., 1375; ... United States v. Alexander, 46 F. 728.) ... If an ... officer in making an arrest acts in such ... State (Tex. Cr. ), 74 S.W. 764; State v ... Sheppard, 49 W.Va. 582, 39 S.E. 676; Hall v. United ... States, 150 U.S. 76, 14 S.Ct. 22, [41 Idaho 620] 37 ... L.Ed. 1003; State v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT