Halmadge v. Village of Riggins, 8472

Citation78 Idaho 328,303 P.2d 244
Decision Date30 October 1956
Docket NumberNo. 8472,8472
PartiesAugust HALMADE and Frankle H. Heath, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The VILLAGE OF RIGGINS, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Respondent.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Idaho

Wm. J. Dee, Grangeville, for appellants.

Wm. H. Foster, Grangeville, for respondent.

TAYLOR, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs (appellants) allege they are the owners of the Black Sand placer mining claim; that the defendant (respondent) without their permission, seized the property upon which the claim is located and has used, and is using, the same as a dump ground and has dumped trash and refuse of all kinds thereon, rendering it useless as a mining claim, to their damage in the sum of $5,000; that they filed a claim therefor, with the village clerk, which was denied by the trustees.

The defendant village, in addition to a general denial, alleges affirmatively that the plaintiffs' purported claim was located upon land belonging to the state of Idaho, and was located under the laws of the United States as though upon federal land; and that the defendant has permission from the state of Idaho to use the land.

The validity of the mining location being thus placed in issue, involving the question as to whether the ground attempted to be covered by the claim was open to location under federal law, the trial court determined to try 'the question of plaintiffs' ownership of, or right to possession of, the land involved' as an equitable, or court issue, prior to the contingent issues of trespass and damage. We do not consider the propriety of this procedure for the reason that the record does not show any objection thereto by either party. Baird v. Gibberd, 32 Idaho 796, 189 P. 56; Johnson v. Niichels, 48 Idaho 654, 284 P. 840; Radermacher v. Daniels, 64 Idaho 376, 133 P.2d 713; Wormward v. Taylor, 70 Idaho 450, 221 P.2d 686.

Appellants assign as error the finding of the trial court that the place of dumping was situated below the natural high water mark of the Salmon river. The evidence is that the general area involved is located in a wide bend of the river; that a smaller portion of the area consists of wooded ground, from three to ten feet higher than the land lying between this higher ground and the state highway, which runs along the west bank of the river. This lower area 'might be an old river channel'. During high water time each year, a portion of this lower area is occupied by water. The water at such times comes up to the access road which extends from the highway to the dumping area. The bank of the river, on the east side of the higher wooded area, slopes more abruptly to the water. It is down this slope that the dumping is done. This evidence tends to establish that the wooded area and that along the access road are above the natural high water mark, and the rest, including the dumping area, is below that mark.

Such evidence supports the finding of the trial court that the land 'upon which the defendant was in fact dumping trash and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • White v. Ames Min. Co., 8760
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Idaho
    • 18 Febrero 1960
    ...as the lands were not then subject to location as a part of the public domain of the United States.' See also Halmadge v. Village of Riggins, 78 Idaho 328, 303 P.2d 244; Kendall v. San Juan Silver Min. Co., 9 Colo. 349, 12 P. 198, affirmed 144 U.S. 658, 12 S.C.t. 779, 36 L.Ed. 583; Gibson v......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT