Halpin v. City of Kansas

Decision Date31 October 1882
CitationHalpin v. City of Kansas, 76 Mo. 335 (Mo. 1882)
PartiesHALPIN v. THE CITY OF KANSAS, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Jackson Special Law and Equity Court.--HON. R. E. COWAN, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

D. S. Twitchell for appellant.

Tichenor & Warner for respondent.

NORTON, J.

This suit is for the recovery of damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff, Mary Halpin, by reason of the negligence of the defendant in allowing a hole or gully of the depth of twenty-eight inches, to be and remain unguarded on the east side of the sidewalk on Washington street in the City of Kansas, into which hole or gully plaintiff, as alleged in the petition, without fault on her part, fell and was injured. Upon the trial of the cause plaintiff recovered judgment for $500, from which defendant has appealed.

It appears from the record before us that the only exception saved during the progress of the entire trial, was to the action of the court in overruling defendant's demurrer to the evidence introduced by plaintiffs to make out their case. Hence, it follows that the propriety of the action of the court in the above respect is the only question presented for determination.

We are of the opinion that the demurrer to the evidence was properly overruled.

The evidence tended to show that on the east side of the sidewalk along Washington street, and on the west side of said street, there was a hole or gully twenty-eight inches in depth, ordinary curbing and guttering being from twelve to fourteen inches; that there was no barrier, railing...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
22 cases
  • City of Winona v. Botzet
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • March 26, 1909
    ... ... v. Dozier, 126 Ga. 524, 55 S.E. 234; Bassett v. St ... Joseph, 53 Mo. 290, 14 Am.Rep. 446; Halpin v. City ... of Kansas, 76 Mo. 335; Parker v. City of Macon, ... 39 Ga. 729, 99 Am.Dec. 486), walls, billboards, and other ... structures on ... ...
  • Tritz v. City of Kansas
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1884
    ...Smith et al. v. The City of St. Joseph, 45 Mo. 449; Oliver v. The City of Kansas, 69 Mo. 79; Russell v. Columbia, 74 Mo. 480; Halpin v. Kansas City, 76 Mo. 335; Haire v. Kansas City, 76 Mo. 438. (2) This is not a case of defective legislation on the part of the city, but one of its neglect ......
  • Olian v. Olian
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 20, 1933
    ... ...           Appeal ... from Circuit Court of City of St. Louis; Hon. O'Neill ... Ryan , Judge ...           ... Reversed and remanded ... Coal Co. v. Dozier, 170 Ky. 374, 186 S.W. 140; Lilly ... v. Kansas City Rys. Co., 209 S.W. 969; Hults v ... Miller, 299 S.W. 85. (3) The court erred in giving ... ...
  • Clinkenbeard v. City of St. Joseph
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • October 3, 1928
    ...Civ. App. 519; 6 McQuillin, Municipal Corp., sec. 2774; Baldwin v. Springfield, 141 Mo. 205; Wiggin v. St. Louis, 135 Mo. 558; Halpin v. Kansas City. 76 Mo. 335; Dodge v. Kirkwood, 260 S.W. 1012; Burnes v. Joseph, 91 Mo.App. 489; Coffee v. Carthage, 186 Mo. 573; Fochler v. Kansas City, 94 M......
  • Get Started for Free