Halverson v. Simpson
Decision Date | 22 October 2014 |
Docket Number | CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-484-DLB |
Parties | LEIF HALVERSON PETITIONER v. THOMAS L. SIMPSON, Warden, Kentucky State Penitentiary RESPONDENT |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Kentucky |
This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Leif Halverson's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
On July 22, 1983, a Kentucky state-court jury convicted Halvorsen on three counts of first-degree murder for the deaths of Joe Durrum, Jacqueline Greene and Joe Norman. The trial court sentenced Halverson to death for Durrum and Greene's murders and life imprisonment for Norman's murder. Kentucky state courts affirmed Halverson's convictions and sentences on direct appeal and denied him post-conviction relief. Halvorsen is currently incarcerated at the Kentucky State Penitentiary in Eddyville, Kentucky.
In his § 2254 petition, Halverson contends that he is being held in violation of the United States Constitution because of errors that occurred both during his trial and on appeal. Halverson does not argue that he is innocent. He argues that his constitutional rights were violated because of juror and prosecutorial misconduct, improper jury instructions, ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel, and improper sentencing.Halverson's petition is fully briefed and ripe for review. For the following reasons, the Court will deny Halverson's habeas petition.
On March 7, 1983, a Fayette County Grand Jury indicted Halvorsen, along with Mitchell Willoughby and Susan Hutchens, on three counts of intentional murder and two counts of robbery. The grand jury also charged Halverson and Hutchens with carrying a concealed weapon. Hutchens, who was present when the murders took place, pled guilty to two counts of hindering prosecution and testified at Halvorsen and Willoughby's joint trial. The trial took place in Fayette County Circuit Court with the Honorable Armand Angelucci presiding. The Kentucky Supreme Court provided the following factual summary:
A ballistics expert positively identified several of the projectiles recovered from the victims' bodies as having come from the revolver and semi-automatic pistol found in the truck. Two 9-millimeter shell casings were additionally recovered at 215 Loudon. Fingerprints from both Willoughby and Hutchens were found on the 9-millimeter pistol. Hutchens' fingerprints were found on the refrigerator at 215 Loudon as well.
Also recovered from 215 Loudon, by the police, was a plastic blue-and-yellow rope identical to that found tied around the victims' bodies. Paint samples taken from Halvorsen's van matched the paint smears found on the highway sign near the bridge. A comparison between pieces of glass taken from a broken headlight on Halvorsen's van and pieces of broken headlight recovered from the base of the highway sign proved them to have come from the same headlight. Lastly, blood samples from Halvorsen's van were positively identified as having come from one of the victims.
At trial, Hutchens testified that in December 1982, she and Willoughby moved into the house at 215 Loudon, and Willoughby was employed by the victim, Joe Norman, to help him remodel the house. Willoughby and Hutchens moved out a month later when Norman refused to pay Willoughby for the work he had done.
Halvorsen v. Commonwealth, 730 S.W.2d 921, 922-23 (Ky. 1986).
The jury found Halverson guilty of all three murder charges and guilty of carrying a concealed weapon; the trial court granted a directed verdict on the robbery charge. Halvorsen testified at the penalty phase. During his testimony, Halvorsen admitted shooting two of the victims, but claimed he did so because of extreme intoxication and duress. On August 31, 1983, the trial court followed the jury's recommendation and sentenced Halvorsen to death for Durrum and Greene's murders and life imprisonment for Norman's murder.
1. Halvorsen's direct appeal to the Kentucky Supreme Court
Halvorsen appealed his conviction to the Kentucky Supreme Court, raising twenty-eight assignments of error. The court consolidated Halvorsen's appeal with Willoughby's. Two attorneys from the Kentucky Department of Public Advocacy represented Halvorsen. On December 18, 1986, the Kentucky Supreme Court affirmed Halvorsen's conviction and sentence. Halvorsen, 730 S.W.2d 921.
In denying Halvorsen's appeal, the Court held as follows: (1) the prosecutor did not commit reversible error by telling the jury its sentencing verdict was a "recommendation"; (2) the trial court's "combination" murder instruction did not violate due process or deprive Halvorsen of his right to a unanimous verdict; (3) the trial court did not err by choosing not to give a wanton murder instruction; (4) the prosecutor's closing argument during the penalty phase did not deprive Halvorsen of a fair trial; (5) the prosecutor's cross-examination of Willoughby did not result in comments about Halvorsen's decision not to testify; (6) the prosecutor did not introduce evidence of other crimes or bad acts that impermissibly prejudiced Halvorsen; (7) Halvorsen was not entitled to an instruction on extreme emotional disturbance; (8) the trial court properly instructed the jury on Halvorsen's intoxication defense; (9) the trial court was not required to sua sponte instruct the jury on nonstatutory mitigating factors; and (10) the trial court was not required to instruct the jury that Halvorsen's accomplice participation was a mitigating factor. Id. at 924-26. While the Kentucky Supreme Court did not provide an analysis for denying Halvorsen's other claims, it stated that it "reviewed the other assertions of error and are of the opinion none of them merits comment." Id. at 928.
The Kentucky Supreme Court denied Halvorsen's petition for rehearing. On November 30, 1987, Halverson's convictions and sentences became final when the United States Supreme Court denied Halverson's petition for a writ of certiorari. Halvorsen v. Kentucky, 484 U.S. 970 (1987).
2. Hal...
To continue reading
Request your trial