Hamburger v. Marcus. Corr's Appeal
Decision Date | 02 October 1893 |
Docket Number | 311 |
Citation | 27 A. 681,157 Pa. 133 |
Parties | Hamberger v. Marcus. Corr's Appeal |
Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Argued April 3, 1893
Appeal, No. 311, Jan. T., 1893, by garnishee, Bernard Corr from judgment of C.P. No. 3, Phila. Co., March T., 1892, No 15, on verdict for plaintiff, Philip Hamberger, in case of Philip Hamberger v. Julius Marcus.
Rule for judgment against garnishee on answers in foreign attachment.
The material answers to the interrogatories were as follows:
Rule for judgment absolute. Garnishee appealed.
Error assigned was entry of judgment.
Judgment reversed and procedendo awarded.
John G. Johnson, for appellant. -- Defendant was in garnishee's employ: Act of April 15, 1845, P.L. 460; Smith v. Brooke, 49 Pa. 147; Costello v. Coal Co., 33 Pa. 241; Wentroth's Ap., 3 W.N. 248.
The amount of commissions earned was "salary," within the meaning of the act of April 15, 1845: Heebner v. Chave, 5 Pa. 115; Seider's Ap., 46 Pa. 57; Hutchinson v. Gormley, 48 Pa. 270; Com. v. Butler, 99 Pa. 535; Sweeny v. Hunter, 145 Pa. 363. They were within the words and spirit of the act of 1845, and were not attachable: Adam's Ap., 47 Pa. 94.
The act of 1845 extends to foreign attachments: Firmstone v. Mack, 49 Pa. 387; Catlin v. Ensign, 29 Pa. 264; Sweeny v. Hunter, 145 Pa. 363; Matson v. Bryan, 26 W.N. 248.
Samuel M. Hyneman, for appellee. -- The commissions were neither wages nor salary: Com. v. Butler, 99 Pa. 535.
The nature and character of defendant's employment by appellant were not such as were contemplated by the act of April 15, 1845.
The authorities cited by appellant are not applicable to the facts in this case, as defendant cannot possibly be regarded as a laborer.
Smith v. Brooke, 49 Pa. 147, was a case of a master carpenter engaged in building a house for the owner, who employed laborers under him as his helpers. He actually performed manual labor, and, as far as his compensation was involved, it was free from attachment.
In Costello v. Coal Co., 33 Pa. 241, the miner who contracted to mine coal with the assistance of a helper for so much a ton, actually did part of the mining and performed actual manual labor.
Wentroth's Ap., 3 W.N. 248, raised the question of a lien for wages under the act of 1872. The moneys due to Snyder, who had contracted to deliver to Wolf all the timber cut down upon a certain tract for a certain price per thousand feet, were held not to be a lein, it having been shown by the evidence that he did no manual work himself.
Seider's Ap., 46 Pa. 57, was a case which arose upon the construction of the act of April 2, 1849, relative to preference given to laborer's wages. The only question in this case was whether the wages of colaborers were to be preferred claims.
The decision in Hutchinson v. Gormley, 48 Pa. 270, which held that the fees of a gauger of oil for Allegheny county were not subject to attachment, was based not upon the construction of the words wages or salary, but was decided upon an entirely different principle, to wit, that a public officer shall not be obstructed in the performance of public duties by individual creditors: Heebner v. Chave, 5 Pa. 115; Penna. Coal Co. v. Costello, 33 Pa. 241; Smith v. Brooke, 49 Pa. 147; Wentroth's Ap., 3 W.N. 48; Schwaake v. Langton, 6 W.N. 124.
Before STERRETT, C.J., GREEN, WILLIAMS, McCOLLUM, MITCHELL, DEAN and THOMPSON, JJ.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered against a garnishee in a suit commenced by a writ of foreign attachment. The judgment was entered on the answers of the garnishee to the interrogatories filed. It is contended by the garnishee that the debt due from him to the defendant is not liable to attachment. It appears from his answers that he employed the defendant from time to time to sell liquors and allowed him for his services commissions on the sales; that when the attachment was served he was entitled to commissions amounting to the sum of $125, and during the next seven months he earned and was paid commissions amounting to the sum of $399.78. The judgment includes the commissions earned and paid after, as well as the commissions earned and unpaid when, the attachment was served. The answers therefore present, prima facie, a case in which a creditor is seeking to appropriate in satisfaction of his claim the commissions due from an employer to his employee. These commissions constitute the compensation of the employee for personal services performed for his employer under an agreement between them. Are they liable to attachment? It is provided in section 5 of the act of April 15, 1845, P.L. 460 "that the wages of any laborer or the salary of any person in public or private employment shall not be liable to attachment in the hands of the employer." It was the obvious purpose of this act to enable laborers and persons in public or private employment to receive from their employers compensation for their personal services without hindrance from their creditors. The miner who is paid by the ton, the mechanic who is paid by the piece, and the clerk or salesman who is paid by commissions on his sales, are as much within its protection as if they were paid by the day, week, month or year. A wholesale merchant employs two persons to travel over the country and obtain from the retail dealers orders for his goods; to one of them he pays a certain sum per month and to the other he pays commissions on the amount of orders taken. These commissions are as clearly compensation of the employee for personal services in the interest and for the benefit of the employer as the monthly stipend is. It is a narrow construction of the statute which allows the creditors of one employee to attach in the hands of the employer the commissions which constitute his compensation for personal services and exempts from attachment in the hands of the same employer the compensation of another employee for like services. A construction which admits of such results is not warranted by a mere difference in the method of compensation. In Wentroth's Appeal, 3 W.N. 248, the question was whether the claimant was a laborer within the meaning of the act of April 9, 1872, P.L. 47, and this court said: "If he was a laborer it must be conceded that it does not matter in what manner his services were to be compensated -- whether by daily wages or by the quantity of lumber delivered." In Seider's Appeal, 46 Pa. 57,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.
...is compensation for services performed. E.g., Sheryl Records, Inc. v. The Cyrkle, 431 Pa. 299, 245 A.2d 454 (1968); Hamberger v. Marcus, 157 Pa. 133, 27 A. 681 (1893); Commonwealth ex rel. Wolfe v. Butler, 99 Pa. 535 (1882). In contrast, an expense allowance is an amount furnished to pay fo......
-
First Nat Bank v. Barnum
...v. Marcus, 157 Pa. 133, 27 A. 681, 37 Am.St.Rep. 719. But not a factor or broker, engaged in the business of selling goods on commission. Id. Nor a millowner, who saws lumber others at so much a thousand. Campfield v. Land (C.C.) 25 F. 128. Nor one who builds a house or other structure, by ......
-
Wolf v. Commander
... ... Chemical Co., 54 N.J.Eq. 309, 35 A. 157; Hamberger ... v. Marcus, 157 Pa. 133, 27 A. 681, 37 Am.St.Rep. 719; ... Laird v. Carton, 196 N.Y ... ...
-
Acme Engineers v. Foster Engineering Company
...Sampson received his compensation in the form of commissions would not change his status as a traveling salesman, Hamberger v. Marcus, 157 Pa. 133, 27 A. 681, 37 Am.St.Rep. 719; In re Dexter, 1 Cir., 158 F. 788; nor would the fact that Sampson represented other manufacturers and received hi......