Hamel v. Employment Sec. Dept. of State of Washington

Decision Date01 June 1999
Citation137 Wn.2d 1036,980 P.2d 1283
CourtWashington Supreme Court
PartiesTodd M. Hamel v. Employment Security Department of State of Washington NO. 67722-1

Petition For Review: Denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
30 cases
  • Smith v. Employment Security Dept.
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • March 9, 2010
    ... ... No. 37492-7-II ... Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2 ... March 9, 2010 ... [226 P.3d 265] ... their knowledge or consent in violation of Kitsap County policy and state law. Additionally, the Commissioner found that Smith committed misconduct ... Verizon Nw., Inc. v. Employment Sec. Dep't, 164 Wash.2d 909, 915, 194 P.3d 255 (2008). We sit in the same ... Hamel v. Employment Sec. Dep't, 93 Wash.App. 140, 146-47, 966 P.2d 1282 (1998), ... ...
  • Leibbrand v. EMPLOYMENT SEC. DEPT.
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • July 23, 2001
    ... ... 411 Craig LEIBBRAND, Appellant, ... EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT of the State of Washington, Respondent ... No. 47149-0-I ... Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 ... § 705(20)(C)(v) ...          27. RCW 50.04.293 ...          28. Hamel v. Employment Sec. Dep't, 93 Wash. App. 140, 145, 966 P.2d 1282 (1998), review denied, 137 ... ...
  • Superior Asphalt & Concrete Co. v. L&I
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • June 21, 2002
    ... ... ASPHALT AND CONCRETE COMPANY, a Washington Corporation; and Western States Asphalt Company, ... DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES of the State of Washington, Respondent ... No. 27044-7-II ... Tapper v. State Employment Sec. Dep't, 122 Wash.2d 397, 402, 858 P.2d 494 ... Hamel v. Employment Sec. Dep't, 93 Wash.App. 140, 145, ... ...
  • Ferencak v. Department
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • January 22, 2008
    ... ... 58878-8-I ... Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 ... January 22, 2008 ... [175 ... his right knee in the course of his employment at Travis Industries, Inc. (Travis). He applied ... 288, 293, 88 P.3d 413 (citing Hamel v. Employment Sec. Dep't, 93 Wash.App. 140, 144, ... 6, 57 P.3d 611 (2002) (citing State v. Hill, 123 Wash.2d 641, 644, 870 P.2d 313 ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Appellate Practice Deskbook (WSBA) Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...Hearings Bd., 85 Wn.2d 441, 536 P.2d 157 (1975): 5.4(3) Hamel v. Emp't Sec. Dep't, 93 Wn. App. 140, 966 P.2d 1282 (1998), review denied, 137 Wn.2d 1036 (1999): 21.12(1)(b) Hamilton v. Huggins, 70 Wn. App. 842, 855 P.2d 1216 (1993): 13.2(4) Hamilton v. Pac. Drug Co., 78 Wash. 689, 139 P. 642......
  • § 21.12 Remedies in Judicial Review Proceedings
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Appellate Practice Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 21 Judicial Review on the Record of an Administrative Action
    • Invalid date
    ...a reversal or modification of the agency's action. Hamel v. Emp't Sec. Dep't, 93 Wn.App. 140, 148, 966 P.2d 1282 (1998), review denied, 137 Wn.2d 1036 (1999). An order for remand should state the statutory basis for the remand. For a remand under RCW 34.05.574, the court's order must contai......