Hamilos v. Hamilos
Decision Date | 14 September 1983 |
Docket Number | No. 154,154 |
Citation | 465 A.2d 445,297 Md. 99 |
Parties | Peggy Ryan HAMILOS v. James C. HAMILOS. |
Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Joseph F. Shanahan (Thomas J. Beetel, Flemington, N.J., and Richard T. Cremin, Baltimore, on the brief) for appellant.
Thomas D. Washburne, Baltimore (William E. Maseth, Jr., and Ober, Grimes & Shriver, Baltimore, on the brief) for appellee.
Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON, RODOWSKY and COUCH, JJ.
In this case we are asked, once again, to determine whether a voluntary separation and property settlement agreement approved and incorporated but not merged in a divorce decree may be collaterally attacked. 1 Alternatively, Mrs. Hamilos argues that the decree should be modified pursuant to Maryland Rule 625 a 2 as the agreement was obtained by fraud and the decree was obtained through irregularity and mistake. For reasons discussed herein, we hold that the agreement may not be collaterally attacked as its validity was conclusively established by the decree which operates as res judicata. In addition, we hold that the requirements of Rule 625 a have not been met. Accordingly, we shall affirm the Court of Special Appeals. Hamilos v. Hamilos, 52 Md.App. 488, 450 A.2d 1316 (1982).
The parties hereto were married in April, 1960, and separated in September, 1978. Of the three children produced by the marriage, one is still a minor. In March, 1979, Mrs. Hamilos filed a "Bill of Complaint for Divorce A Mensa Et Thoro" in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. In December, 1979, the parties executed a "Voluntary Separation and Property Settlement Agreement" as "[i]t [wa]s the mutual desire of the parties to formalize said voluntary separation and to settle all questions of custody of their children, maintenance and support, alimony, counsel fees, their respective rights in the property or estate of the other, and in property owned by them jointly or as tenants by the entireties, and all other matters of every kind and character arising from their marital relationship." The agreement provided, inter alia, that the husband was to have "custody of the minor children of the parties with reasonable rights of visitation to [the] wife...." Paragraph 4 of the agreement provided for the support and maintenance of the wife as follows:
Paragraph 20 of the agreement provided:
(Emphasis supplied).
In January, 1980, Mrs. Hamilos filed an "Amended Bill of Complaint for Divorce A Vinculo Matrimonii" and prayed "[t]hat the Voluntary Separation and Property Settlement Agreement between the parties dated December 28, 1979, be made a part of any Decree of this Court." Following a hearing before a master, the parties were divorced a vinculo matrimonii on March 27, 1980. The decree stated in pertinent part:
"AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, DECREED AND ADJUDGED that the pertinent terms of the Agreement and Addendum thereto, by and between the parties to this proceeding, hereto dated December 28, 1979, and filed with the Testimony in this cause of action be, and that they are hereby ratified and approved and made a part hereof, as if fully set forth herein...." (Emphasis added).
Seventeen months later, on August 31, 1981, Mrs. Hamilos filed a "Petition to Set Aside Divorce Decree and Voluntary Separation and Property Settlement Agreement and Addendum to Same" on the basis that she "was not possessed of sufficient mental capacity to enter in to said Agreement, or knowingly participate in the action for divorce" due to the use of alcohol and prescribed drugs. She further alleged that the agreement was without consideration; that it was obtained by coercion, duress, and/or fraud on the part of Mr. Hamilos; and that the agreement and divorce decree were obtained through irregularity or mistake. The petition prayed that both the decree and agreement be set aside. The petition was subsequently amended wherein Mrs. Hamilos sought a declaratory judgment regarding alimony payments and the marital property in addition to having the agreement set aside.
Mr. Hamilos responded by filing a demurrer which, subsequent to a hearing, was sustained by the chancellor (Dorf, J.). The chancellor ruled that Mrs. Hamilos was in effect seeking to set aside an enrolled decree and, accordingly, applied Maryland Rule 625, concluding:
The Court of Special Appeals agreed that Rule 625 was applicable and affirmed the chancellor as "Mrs. Hamilos' assertions ... do not constitute fraud, mistake or irregularity within the meaning of Rule 625a." Hamilos, supra, 52 Md.App. at 497, 450 A.2d at 1322. We granted certiorari to consider an issue of public importance.
(1)
The threshold issue, which neither the chancellor nor the intermediate appellate court...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tandra S. v. Tyrone W.
...to vacate an enrolled judgment is extrinsic fraud, not fraud which is intrinsic to the trial of the case itself. See Hamilos v. Hamilos, 297 Md. 99, 105, 465 A.2d 445 (1983). In Hresko v. Hresko, 83 Md.App. 228, 232, 574 A.2d 24 (1990), the Court of Special Appeals clearly distinguished int......
-
Montgomery County v. Revere Nat. Corp., Inc., 118
...648 A.2d 439, 445-446 (1994); Autobahn Motors v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 321 Md. 558, 583 A.2d 731 (1991); Hamilos v. Hamilos, 297 Md. 99, 465 A.2d 445 (1983); Weitz v. MacKenzie, 273 Md. 628, 331 A.2d 291 (1975); Schwartz v. Merchants Mort. Co., 272 Md. 305, 322 A.2d 544 (1974);......
-
Facey v. Facey
...the decision has been rendered, and the litigants afforded every opportunity for review." Id . ; see also Hamilos v. Hamilos , 297 Md. 99, 105-106, 465 A.2d 445 (1983) (allegations that a husband coerced his wife into signing a separation agreement and obtaining to a divorce did not constit......
-
Minger v. State
...error only. 124 Md.App. at 242 n. 8, 721 A.2d 259; see also Tandra S., 336 Md. at 317, 648 A.2d 439 (citing Hamilos v. Hamilos, 297 Md. 99, 107, 465 A.2d 445 (1983)). "The typical kind of mistake occurs when a judgment has been entered in the absence of valid service of process; hence, the ......