Hamilton v. Alabama

Decision Date30 March 1964
Docket NumberNo. 793,793
Citation11 L.Ed.2d 979,376 U.S. 650,84 S.Ct. 982
PartiesMary HAMILTON v. ALABAMA
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and Oscar W. Adams, Jr., for petitioner.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen. of Alabama, and Bernard F. Sykes and Owen Bridges, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.

PER CRIAM.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed. Johnson v. Virginia, 373 U.S. 61, 83 S.Ct. 1053, 10 L.Ed.2d 195.

Mr. Justice BLACK concurs in rever al of the judgment of contempt for reasons discussed in In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 75 S.Ct. 623, 99 L.Ed. 942; In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682, and Thompson v. City of Louisville, 362 U.S. 199, 80 S.Ct. 624, 4 L.Ed.2d 654. Cf. Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 75 S.Ct. 11, 99 L.Ed. 11.

Mr. Justice CLARK, Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
28 cases
  • United States ex rel. Haynes v. McKendrick, 70 Civ. 3041.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 25 Octubre 1972
    ...Avery v. Georgia, 345 U.S. 559, 73 S.Ct. 891, 97 L.Ed. 1244 (1953) (exclusion of Negroes from petit jury); Hamilton v. Alabama, 376 U.S. 650, 84 S.Ct. 982, 11 L.Ed.2d 979 (1964) (discrimination by state attorney in addressing Negro witnesses); Johnson v. Virginia, 373 U.S. 61, 83 S.Ct. 1053......
  • Bell v. State of Maryland
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 22 Junio 1964
    ...of tutelage, if not of peonage.' ---------- 4. Other 'relics of slavery' have recently come before this Court. In Hamilton v. Alabama, 376 U.S. 650, 84 S.Ct. 982, we reversed a judgment of contempt imposed on a Negro witness under these circumstances: 'Cross examination by Solicitor Rayburn......
  • Johnson, In re
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • 29 Octubre 1970
    ... ... omitted.) Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (right to counsel at trial), Hamilton v. Alabama (1961) 368 U.S. 52, 84 S.Ct. 982, 11 L.Ed.2d 979 (counsel at arraignment), and Douglas v. California (1963) 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 ... ...
  • Greene v. City of Memphis
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 1 Noviembre 1979
    ...him when he addressed her as "Mary," although she had made the simple request to be called "Miss Hamilton." Hamilton v. Alabama, 376 U.S. 650 (84 S.Ct. 982, 11 L.Ed.2d 979). The closing of West Drive is merely another device leading to the same result. It would be, to blacks and whites alik......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Racial Justice and Federal Habeas Corpus as Postconviction Relief from State Convictions
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 69-2, January 2018
    • Invalid date
    ...U.S. 61, 62 (1963).14. See HIGGINBOTHAM, supra note 8, at 132-34.15. In Ex parte Mary Hamilton, 156 So. 2d 926, 926-27 (Ala. 1963), rev'd, 376 U.S. 650 (1964), African-American witnesses were refused the respect and the implied credibility from being addressed on the stand by more than just......
  • Teaching an Old Dog New Tricks: a Thirteenth Amendment Framework for Challenging Racial Discrimination in Policing
    • United States
    • California Lawyers Association Criminal Law Journal (CLA) No. 18-2, December 2018
    • Invalid date
    ...Gayle v. Browder, 352 U.S. 903 (1956)).72. Id. (citing Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131 (1966)).73. Id. (citing Hamilton v. Alabama, 376 U.S. 650 (1964)).74. Id.75. See generally Balkin & Levinson, supra note 41, at 1460-61 (evaluating the limited application of the Thirteenth Amendment sin......
  • "like Wolves in Sheep's Clothing": Combating Racial Bias in Washington State's Criminal Justice System
    • United States
    • Seattle University School of Law Seattle University Law Review No. 35-03, March 2012
    • Invalid date
    ...the minimal standards of due process.'" (citing State v. Parnell, 463 P.2d 134, 137 (Wash. 1969))). 70. See, e.g., Hamilton v. Alabama, 376 U.S. 650 (1964). 71. Monday, 257 P.3d at 557. 72. Id.at 558 n.5. 73. Id.at 557-58. The court clarified that "[t]he constitutional promise of an 'impart......
  • Reflections on justice before and after Brown.
    • United States
    • Fordham Urban Law Journal Vol. 32 No. 1, December 2004
    • 1 Diciembre 2004
    ...Johnson v. State of Virginia, 373 U.S. 61 (1963), a decision with similar facts to Hamilton, which soley cited Brown. Hamilton v. Alabama, 376 U.S. 650 (1964). There was no oral argument, just the Brown citation through Johnson. The state could no longer make any distinctions among its citi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT