HAMILTON V. ALLEN
| Docket Number | No. CA 06-1051 |
| Decision Date | 07 November 2007 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
20 cases
-
Stewart v. Deaton
...standard of care. See, e.g. , Skaggs v. Johnson , 323 Ark. 320, 915 S.W.2d 253 (1996) ; Robson, supra. In Hamilton v. Allen , 100 Ark. App. 240, 267 S.W.3d 627 (2007), this court took the opportunity to review and clarify the parties’ burdens of proof regarding summary judgment in a medical......
-
Cheatwood v. Mwanza
...act in accordance with that standard; and (3) that such failure was a proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries." Hamilton v. Allen, 267 S.W.3d 627, 632 (Ark. App. 2007). Expert testimony is required to prove each of these elements if the asserted negligence does not lie within the jury's......
-
Davis v. Pulaski Cnty.
...269, 915 S.W.2d 675, 678 (1996) (quoting Graham v. Sisco, 248 Ark. 6, 449 S.W.2d 949 (1970)). 115. Id. 116. Hamilton v. Allen, 100 Ark. App. 240, 248-49, 267 S.W.3d 627, 634 (2007) ("In Skaggs v. Johnson and in Robson v. Tinnin, the movants met their burden of proving a prima facie case for......
-
Quattlebaum v. McCarver
...there is a genuine issue as to a material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Hamilton v. Allen, 100 Ark. App. 240, 267 S.W.3d 627 (2007) (citing Ark. R. Civ. P. 56(c) and Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986)). Once the moving party has established......
Get Started for Free
