Hamilton v. Federal Land Bank, 32222

CourtMississippi Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtMcGowen, J.
Citation175 Miss. 462,167 So. 642
PartiesHAMILTON et al. v. FEDERAL LAND BANK
Decision Date27 April 1936
Docket Number32222

167 So. 642

175 Miss. 462

HAMILTON et al.
v.
FEDERAL LAND BANK

No. 32222

Supreme Court of Mississippi

April 27, 1936


Division A

1. LANDLORD AND TENANT.

Ordinarily, relation of landlord and tenant will be implied from one party's ownership of land and another's occupancy thereof by owner's permission.

[175 Miss. 463]

2. LANDLORD AND TENANT.

Landowner's acceptance of rent from one occupying land by owner's permission for several years prima facie established relation of landlord and tenant by the year.

3. LANDLORD AND TENANT.

Where relation of landlord and tenant exists and there is holding from year to year with no definite period for termination of lease, notice to terminate tenancy is essential to maintenance of suit against tenant for possession (Code 1930, section 2224).

4. LANDLORD AND TENANT.

Landowner, demanding and receiving payment of annual rent from one entering on land, elected to constitute and acknowledge latter as tenant, thereby impliedly creating tenancy by year, and tenant had right to presume that such relation would continue for year into which he held over, in absence of statutory notice to contrary (Code 1930, section 2224).

HON. ARTHUR G. BUSBY, Judge.

APPEAL from the circuit court of Clarke county HON. ARTHUR G. BUSBY, Judge.

Proceedings in unlawful entry and detainer by the Federal Land Bank against Buster Hamilton. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed, and judgment entered for appellant.

Reversed, and judgment entered for appellant.

W. F. Latham, of Quitman, for appellant.

Periodical tenancy arises by entry and payment of rent thereunder, tenancy is from year to year, by payment and acceptance of the rents annually, the almost universal rule at present that a parole lease for years, under which possession is taken and rent paid creates a tenancy from year to year.

Scruggs v. McGehee, 110 Miss. 10.

Where the tenant continues to occupy and enters upon another year without objections from the landlord and with his silent or tacit consent and approval, a tenancy for another year is thus created and cannot be terminated in the middle of the term, and in the midst of the crop, but only at the end of the year.

Usher v. Moss, 50 Miss. 208.

In all cases in which a notice is required to be given by the landlord to tenant to terminate tenancy, two months notice in writing shall be given where the holding is from year to year.

Section 2224, Code of 1930.

Landlord must comply with the law relative to notice to terminate tenancy.

Wilson v. Wood, 84 Miss. 728.

H. F. Case, of Quitman, for appellee.

There did not exist between appellee and appellant the relation of landlord and tenant.

We respectfully submit to the court that on this record it will appear that the facts are undisputed; that there was no relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties and there was therefore no necessity for any sixty days written notice to terminate a tenancy. The appellant's sole contention is that he was entitled to hold possession of the property because appellee failed to give him sixty days written notice to terminate the tenancy prior to the first of January 1935. We respectfully submit that this contention is without any merit whatever.

OPINION [167 So. 643]

[175 Miss. 464] McGowen, J.

The appellee, Federal Land Bank, instituted unlawful entry and detainer proceedings before a justice of the peace against the appellant, Buster Hamilton, for possession of certain lands. The case was tried before three justices of the peace, who rendered a judgment in favor of appellee. Buster Hamilton appealed to the circuit court where the cause was submitted to a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of appellee for...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 practice notes
  • Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Pitts, 33056
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 7 Marzo 1938
    ...103 Miss. 130, 60 So. 66; Love v. Law, 47 Miss. 596; Tonkel v. Riteman, 141 So. 344; [181 Miss. 357] Hamilton v. Federal Land Bank, 167 So. 642; 35 C. J., page 957, par. 21, and page 959, par. 22; Scruggs v. McGehee, 110 Miss. 10, 69 So. 1003. We are familiar with the doctrine that it is ne......
  • Pitts v. Mississippi Power & Light Co., 32387
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 23 Noviembre 1936
    ...v. Presbyterian Church, 103 Miss. 130, 60 So. 66; Love v. Law, 57 Miss. 596; Usher v. Moss, 50 Miss. 208; Hamilton v. Federal Land Bank, 167 So. 642. The appellees conspiring together each knowing full well the rights of the appellant to occupy said building and to engage in the ice busines......
  • Chapman v. Chase Nat Bank, 32627
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 12 Abril 1937
    ...be implied where there is ownership of land, on the one hand, and occupancy, by permission, on the other. Hamilton v. Federal Land Bank, 167 So. 642; 35 C. J., page 957, sec. 21, page 959, sec. 22. Where the tenant continues to occupy, and enters upon another year without objection from the......
  • Graham v. Cauthen, 32223
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 11 Mayo 1936
    ...Miss. 10, 69 So. 1003; Richardson v. Neblett 122 Miss. 723, 84 So. 695, 10 A. L. R. 272; and Buster Hamilton v. Federal Land Bank (Miss.), 167 So. 642, decided April 27, 1936, in apposition thereto. The court in this case erred in peremptorily instructing the jury that rents could be apport......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Pitts, 33056
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 7 Marzo 1938
    ...103 Miss. 130, 60 So. 66; Love v. Law, 47 Miss. 596; Tonkel v. Riteman, 141 So. 344; [181 Miss. 357] Hamilton v. Federal Land Bank, 167 So. 642; 35 C. J., page 957, par. 21, and page 959, par. 22; Scruggs v. McGehee, 110 Miss. 10, 69 So. 1003. We are familiar with the doctrine that it is ne......
  • Pitts v. Mississippi Power & Light Co., 32387
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 23 Noviembre 1936
    ...v. Presbyterian Church, 103 Miss. 130, 60 So. 66; Love v. Law, 57 Miss. 596; Usher v. Moss, 50 Miss. 208; Hamilton v. Federal Land Bank, 167 So. 642. The appellees conspiring together each knowing full well the rights of the appellant to occupy said building and to engage in the ice busines......
  • Chapman v. Chase Nat Bank, 32627
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 12 Abril 1937
    ...be implied where there is ownership of land, on the one hand, and occupancy, by permission, on the other. Hamilton v. Federal Land Bank, 167 So. 642; 35 C. J., page 957, sec. 21, page 959, sec. 22. Where the tenant continues to occupy, and enters upon another year without objection from the......
  • Graham v. Cauthen, 32223
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 11 Mayo 1936
    ...Miss. 10, 69 So. 1003; Richardson v. Neblett 122 Miss. 723, 84 So. 695, 10 A. L. R. 272; and Buster Hamilton v. Federal Land Bank (Miss.), 167 So. 642, decided April 27, 1936, in apposition thereto. The court in this case erred in peremptorily instructing the jury that rents could be apport......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT