Hamilton v. Tenn. Secondary Sch. Athletic Ass'n, 76-1067.

Decision Date08 April 1976
Docket NumberNo. 76-1067.,76-1067.
PartiesVictor HAMILTON, by his next friend, Virgil Hamilton, Jr., Intervenor-Appellee, v. TENNESSEE SECONDARY SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

Charles Hampton White, Cornelius, Collins, Higgins & White, Nashville, Tenn., for defendant-appellant.

Thomas M. Daniel, Memphis & Shelby County Legal Services Ass'n, Memphis, Tenn., for intervenor-appellee.

Before PECK, LIVELY and ENGEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This is an appeal by the Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association (TSSAA) from an order of the district court granting a preliminary injunction enjoining TSSAA from prohibiting the appellee Victor Hamilton from participating in interscholastic athletics on behalf of Memphis Frayser High School. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a). The appellee does not contend that the eligibility rules of TSSAA are invalid. He argues in this court, as he did successfully in the district court, that he was entitled to reasonable notice and a hearing on the issue of whether he had lost his athletic eligibility by transferring from one school in the Memphis school district to another school in the same district in the absence of a change of residence by his parents.

Upon examination of the record the court concludes that the district court abused its discretion in granting a preliminary injunction in this case. This case was brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the entire basis for relief was the appellee's assertion that TSSAA had acted in violation of his right to due process of law as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. As the Fifth Circuit stated in Mitchell v. Louisiana High School Athletic Association, 430 F.2d 1155, 1157-58 (5 Cir. 1970),

For better or worse, the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment does not insulate a citizen from every injury at the hands of the state. "Only those rights, privileges and immunities that are secured by the Constitution of the United States or some Act of Congress are within the protection of the federal courts. Rights, privileges and immunities not derived from the federal Constitution or secured thereby are left exclusively to the protection of the states." Quoting from 1 W. Barron & A. Holtzoff, Federal Practice § 37 at 200 (Wright ed. 1960). The privilege of participating in interscholastic athletics must be deemed to fall in the latter category and outside the protection of due process. (citations omitted).

The judgment of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
45 cases
  • Equity in Athletics, Inc. v. Department of Educ.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Virginia
    • 21 Agosto 2007
    ...in interscholastic athletics must be deemed to fall ... outside the protection of due process"); Hamilton v. Tenn. Secondary Sch. Athletic Ass'n, 552 F.2d 681, 682 (6th Cir.1976) (rejecting the argument that the privilege of participating in interscholastic athletics is protected by the Fou......
  • Bailey v. Truby
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • 11 Julio 1984
    ...Cir.1978); Colorado Seminary (University of Denver) v. NCAA, 570 F.2d 320, 321 (10th Cir.1978); Hamilton v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association, 552 F.2d 681, 682 (6th Cir.1976); Albach v. Odle, 531 F.2d 983, 984-85 (10th Cir.1976); Parish v. NCAA, 506 F.2d 1028, 1034 (5th Cir.1......
  • Justice v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Arizona
    • 18 Noviembre 1983
    ...581 F.2d 81, 84 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936, 99 S.Ct. 1280, 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979); Hamilton v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association, 552 F.2d 681, 682 (6th Cir.1976).8 This Court need not address itself to the question whether the plaintiffs here have a protectable......
  • Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n, Inc. v. Carlberg by Carlberg
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • 19 Diciembre 1997
    ...(5th Cir.1983) (student's interest in interscholastic activities falls outside of due process rights); Hamilton v. Tenn. Secondary Sch. Athletic Ass'n, 552 F.2d 681, 682 (6th Cir.1976) (privilege of participation in interscholastic sports is outside due process protections); Albach v. Odle ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT