Hamm v. Georgia
| Docket Number | S13A1696 |
| Decision Date | 17 March 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
50 cases
-
State v. Lane
...877 (1997) ; Jenkins v. State , 268 Ga. 468, 471 (3), 491 S.E.2d 54 (1997), overruled on other grounds by Hamm v. State , 294 Ga. 791, 796 (2) & n.7, 756 S.E.2d 507 (2014) ; Mallory v. State , 261 Ga. 625, 628-629 (4), 409 S.E.2d 839 (1991), abrogated on other grounds by statute as stated i......
-
Ash v. State
...because the State presented evidence corroborating the alleged accomplice's testimony. See id. However, in Hamm v. State , 294 Ga. 791, 796 (2), 756 S.E.2d 507 (2014), we overruled Fleming and other decisions from this Court and the Court of Appeals applying that rule, reasoning instead tha......
-
Horton v. State
...and was the only witness who affirmatively identified Stanbury. See id. at 129-130 (2), 786 S.E.2d 672. Finally, in Hamm v. State , 294 Ga. 791, 756 S.E.2d 507 (2014), the witness "set up a lick," decoyed the victim to the scene of the shooting, fled the scene immediately afterwards, left t......
-
Payne v. State
...likely affect the outcome, we need not consider the significance of the case having been tried before our decision in Hamm v. State , 294 Ga. 791, 756 S.E.2d 507 (2014), which overruled our prior precedent holding that it was not error for a trial court to refuse to give a requested instruc......
Get Started for Free