Hammond Et Al v. Mason and Hamlin Organ Company

Decision Date01 October 1875
Citation92 U.S. 724,23 L.Ed. 767
PartiesHAMMOND ET AL. v. MASON AND HAMLIN ORGAN COMPANY
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

Mr. B. E. Valentine for the appellants.

Mr. Frederick H. Betts, contra.

MR. JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the court.

On the eighteenth day of November, 1856, a patent issued to Lafayette Louis for an invention which produced a tremolo in the musical notes of melodeons or reed instruments, and which has since become known as the tremolo attachment. Louis surrendered and obtained reissues of this patent on the twenty-sixth day of February, 1867, and again on the twenty-sixth day of May, 1868; and after his death his wife, who was his administratrix, obtained in July, 1871, what appears to have been both a reissue and a renewal for seven years of the same patent, the whole right in which she assigned to plaintiffs May 30, 1872.

Whereupon the present suit, which is a bill in chancery, is brought against the defendants, as infringers, for an injunction and for an account of profits, and other relief.

The defendants, not denying the allegation of the use of the invention, interpose a plea; and on this plea the case was heard and a decree rendered dismissing the bill.

The plea sets up the right to use the invention described in the reissued patent of 1872, in defendants, as shown by five several written instruments, signed by Louis in his lifetime, which were made parts of the plea as exhibits A, B, C, D, and E.

The first of these is a contract between said Louis and Henry Mason and Emmons Hamlin, for the use by the latter in their melodeons, of the original invention of Louis, and is dated April 10, 1861. Exhibit B is a copy of an application by Louis for a patent for an improvement in his tremolo attachment, with the accompanying specifications, and is dated Sept. 25, 1868. Exhibits C, D, and E are all dated the same day as this application and are contracts between said Louis and the Mason and Hamlin Organ Company for the sale of this improvement, and its use in connection with the invention already patented in 1856, and reissued in 1867 and 1868.

Exhibit A is a contract by which Louis agrees to furnish to Mason and Hamlin his patent tremolo attachment in such numbers and as they may order them, at one dollar for each attachment; and if he fails to furnish them as ordered, Mason and Hamlin are licensed to make, use, and sell the same in connection with all musical instruments manufactured by them anywhere in the United States. The closing paragraph of this contract declares that 'the said parties mutually bind themselves and their legal representatives to the covenants and agreements herein contained, to continue in force until the full expiration of the term for which said letters-patent have been granted, and during such period as the same may be hereafter renewed or extended.'

It is not alleged that any of the subsequent contracts abogated this one. It cannot be denied that this contract extends to the renewal of the patent which was assigned to plaintiffs. The only question on this branch of the plea is, whether the Mason and Hamlin Organ Company are entitled to the rights of Mason and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • First Nat. Bank v. Cash
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • November 7, 1929
    ... ... Company and reinsured by the Illinois Life Insurance ... Company ... Sayles, 98 U.S. 546, 25 L.Ed. 176; ... Hammond v. Mason, etc., Organ Co., 92 U.S. 724, 23 ... L.Ed. 767; ... ...
  • Gate-Way v. Hillgren
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • February 11, 1949
    ...administrators and executors of the parties, but their "`successors and assignees in business and interest.'" Hammond v. Mason & Hamlin Organ Co., 92 U.S. 724, 726, 23 L.Ed. 767. Code of Civ.Proc.Cal. Sec. 473, provides that an assignee or grantee is a "Legal representative" of the assignor......
  • Flanigan v. Security-First Nat. Bank
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • October 8, 1941
    ...the function formerly performed by a demurrer. Kendall v. United States, 7 Wall. 113, 74 U.S. 113, 19 L.Ed. 85; Hammond v. Mason & Hamlin Organ Co., 92 U.S. 724, 23 L.Ed. 767; Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393, 60 U.S. 393, 15 L.Ed. 691; Blythe v. Hinckley, 180 U. S. 333, 21 S.Ct. 390, 45......
  • Friend N. Whitcomb v. Harry W. Whitcomb
    • United States
    • Vermont Supreme Court
    • October 9, 1911
    ... ... 490, 5 Am. St. Rep. 688; ... Hammond" v. M. & H. Organ Co., 92 U.S. 724, ... 23 L.Ed. 767 ... \xC2" ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT