Hammond v. State, 4 Div. 106

Decision Date16 April 1935
Docket Number4 Div. 106
Citation26 Ala.App. 391,160 So. 900
PartiesHAMMOND v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Coffee County; W.L. Parks, Judge.

Lev (alias Lehl, alias Lelve) Hammond, Jr., was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and he appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

J.M Rowe, of Elba, for appellant.

A.A Carmichael, Atty. Gen., and Jas. L. Screws, Asst. Atty. Gen for the State.

RICE Judge.

One of the grounds of defendant's (appellant's) motion for a new trial was as follows, to-wit:

"Defendant further alleges that at the trial of his case in said court on, to-wit; June 7, 1934, after the jury of 12 men had been duly selected, and had been empaneled and sworn; and after the first witness for the State had been duly sworn and put upon the witness stand and had begun to testify against defendant in said cause; that the following incident occurred:
"That the mother of the deceased, Sanford Coleman, was present at said trial, and was seated among the spectators in said court room a distance of, to-wit; 20 feet from the jury box being then and there occupied by said jury trying this defendant's case. Defendant further alleges that while the first State's witness was being examined by the State, that the said mother of the decedent, Sanford Coleman, arose from her seat and then and there loudly cried and prayed and shrieked and yelled, and fell to the floor and cried in a loud voice and generally made a great commotion and scene in the hearing and presence of said jury; that the examination of the first State's witness was then and there stopped by the trial court, and the mother of the decedent, Sanford Coleman, was by order of the trial court, removed from the presence of the jury by the Sheriff and by several spectators then and there in the court; that during her removal from said court room, the said mother of the decedent loudly cried, shrieked, yelled and prayed; that it required the Sheriff and several persons to effect her said removal; and that the cries and yells of the said woman were plainly audible to the jury, even after the removal of the said woman from the presence of the jury, and to the Public Square surrounding the Court House.
"That the defendant then and there in open court, made motion to withdraw the case from the jury and to grant a mistrial and continuance to this defendant on account of the conduct of the mother of said decedent, then and there had and done, in
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • State v. Henry
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • 4 Noviembre 1940
    ... ... HENRY. No. 35876. Supreme Court of Louisiana. November 4, 1940 ... [198 So. 911] ... Appeal ... from Fourteenth ... In the ... case of Hammond v. State, 26 Ala.App. 391, 160 So ... 900, the court held that as the ... 59; Swindle v. State, supra ; State ... v. Thompson, 106 La. 362, 363, 30 So. 895; Berger v ... United States, 295 U.S. 78, 55 ... ...
  • Kendrick v. State, 3 Div. 324
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 22 Abril 1975
    ...in support of his position presently under consideration. The opinions in Oliver v. State, 232 Ala. 5, 166 So. 615, and Hammond v. State, 26 Ala.App. 391, 160 So. 900, contain the broad statement often repeated, to the effect that a party is entitled to a trial free from any extraneous infl......
  • Dilbeck v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 23 Agosto 1991
    ..."While the defendant is entitled to a trial free of any extraneous influences that might be to his prejudice, Hammond v. State, 26 Ala.App. 391, 160 So. 900 (1935), a criminal trial should be public. Jackson v. Mobley, 157 Ala. 408, 47 So. 590 (1908). If the conduct of a spectator interfere......
  • Hall v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 16 Octubre 1979
    ...While the defendant is entitled to a trial free of any extraneous influence that might be to his prejudice, Hammond v. State, 26 Ala.App. 391, 160 So. 900 (1935), a criminal trial should be public. Jackson v. Mobley, 157 Ala. 408, 47 So. 590 (1908). If the conduct of a spectator interferes ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT