Hanahan v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co. (Usa), C.A. No. 9:07 cv 2715-PMD.
Court | United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court of South Carolina |
Writing for the Court | Patrick Michael Duffy |
Citation | 518 F.Supp.2d 780 |
Parties | Ralph B. HANAHAN as attorney-in-fact for Grey M. Geissler under Durable Power of Attorney dated November 29, 2006; as the Manager of Salt Creek Investments, LLC, Conch Point, LLC, and Lyttleton Street, LLC as Trustee of The Grey M. Geissler Trust Agreement dated July 5, 2005, as amended, merged, and re-stated, and as Trustee of the Grey M. Geissler Trust dated February 12, 2007; Grey M. Geissler, individually, as beneficiary and former Trustee of The Rudolph Geissler, Jr. Trust dated April 6, 1999, as amended, and on behalf of the remainder beneficiary and the Successor Trustee(s) of The Rudolph Geissler, Jr. Trust dated April 6, 1999, as amended and of its Marital and Family Trusts; as income beneficiary and former Trustee of the Marital Trust created under Article IX of The Rudolph Geissler, Jr. Trust dated April 6, 1999, as amended; as income beneficiary and former Trustee of the Family Trust created under Article X of The Rudolph Geissler, Jr. Trust dated April 6, 1999, as amended; as the income and principal beneficiary and as the Settlor and Trustee of The Grey Rhett Geissler Trust dated January 25, 2003; as Settlor and former Trustee of The Grey M. Geissler Trust Agreement dated July 5, 2005 as amended, merged, and re-stated; as beneficiary of The Grey M. Geissler Trust Agreement dated July 5, 2005 as amended merged, and re-stated; as Settlor of The Grey M. Geissler Irrevocable Trust Agreement dated December 19, 2005, as Settlor of The Grey M. Geissler Irrevocable Trust Agreement II dated February 27, 2006; and, as named insured in those certain policies of life insurance issued by John Hancock Life Insurance Company, Inc., (USA), Plaintiffs, v. JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., (USA), Jeffery Covelli, Brian Kreider, Signator Insurance Agency, Haynes Brokerage Group, William M. Rhett, Jr. individually, as fiduciary for Grey M. Geissler, as the former Trustee of The Grey M. Geissler Trust Agreement dated July 5, 2005 as amended, as former Attorney-in-Fact and Fiduciary under General Durable Power of Attorney for Grey M. Geissler, as the present or former Manager and/or Agent of Salt Creek Investments, LLC, Conch Point LLC, and of Lyttleton Street, LLC; De facto Trustee of the Rudolph Geissler, Jr. Trusts; as beneficiary of the Grey M. Geissler Irrevocable Trust Agreement dated December 19, 2005; and as beneficiary of the Grey M. Geissler Irrevocable Trust Agreement II dated February 27, 2006; Nancy Rhett, individually, as De facto Trustee of the Rudolph Geissler, Jr. Trust, as Financial Manager of Salt Creek Investments LLC, and as a fiduciary for Grey M. Geissler as beneficiary of the Grey M. Geissler Irrevocable Trust Agreement dated December 19, 2005; as beneficiary of the Grey M. Geissler Irrevocable Trust Agreement II dated February 27, 2006; and as De facto Trustee of The Grey M. Geissler Trust Agreement dated July 5, 2005 as amended; Douglas S. Delaney, individually and as former Trustee of The Grey M. Geissler Irrevocable Trust Agreement dated December 19, 2005; as Trustee of The Grey M. Geissler Irrevocable Trust Agreement II dated February 27, 2006, as De facto Trustee of the Rudolph Geissler, Jr. Trust; as attorney for The Rudolph Geissler, Jr. Trust, Grey M. Geissler, Salt Creek Investments, LLC, Conch Point, LLC, Lyttleton Street, LLC, William M. Rhett, Jr., and Nancy Rhett; and Douglas S. Delaney, P.A., Defendants. |
Decision Date | 12 October 2007 |
Docket Number | C.A. No. 9:07 cv 2715-PMD. |
[518 F.Supp.2d 781]
v.
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., (USA), Jeffery Covelli, Brian Kreider, Signator Insurance Agency, Haynes Brokerage Group, William M. Rhett, Jr. individually, as fiduciary for Grey M. Geissler, as the former Trustee of The Grey M. Geissler Trust Agreement dated July 5, 2005 as amended, as former Attorney-in-Fact and Fiduciary under General Durable Power of Attorney for Grey M. Geissler, as the present or former Manager and/or Agent of Salt Creek Investments, LLC, Conch Point LLC, and of Lyttleton Street, LLC; De facto Trustee of the Rudolph Geissler, Jr. Trusts; as beneficiary of the Grey M. Geissler Irrevocable Trust Agreement dated December 19, 2005; and as beneficiary of the Grey M. Geissler Irrevocable Trust Agreement II dated February 27, 2006; Nancy Rhett, individually, as De facto Trustee of the Rudolph Geissler, Jr. Trust, as Financial Manager of Salt Creek Investments LLC, and as a fiduciary for Grey M. Geissler as beneficiary of the Grey M. Geissler Irrevocable Trust Agreement dated December 19, 2005; as beneficiary of the Grey M. Geissler Irrevocable Trust Agreement II dated February 27, 2006; and as De facto Trustee of The Grey M. Geissler Trust Agreement dated July 5, 2005 as amended; Douglas S. Delaney, individually and as former Trustee of The Grey M. Geissler Irrevocable Trust Agreement dated December 19, 2005; as Trustee of The Grey M. Geissler Irrevocable Trust Agreement II dated February 27, 2006, as De facto Trustee of the Rudolph Geissler, Jr. Trust; as attorney for The Rudolph Geissler, Jr. Trust, Grey M. Geissler, Salt Creek Investments, LLC, Conch Point, LLC, Lyttleton Street, LLC, William M. Rhett, Jr., and Nancy Rhett; and Douglas S. Delaney, P.A., Defendants.
[518 F.Supp.2d 782]
John Rhett Crosswell Bowen, Laughlin and Bowen, Hilton Head Island, SC, for Plaintiffs.
Leslie Arlen Cotter, Jr., Richardson Plowden and Robinson, Columbia, SC,
[518 F.Supp.2d 783]
Sean Michael Bolchoz, Hale and Bolchoz, Hilton Head Island, SC, Thomas S. Tisdale, Jr., Nexsen Pruet Jacobs Pollard and Robinson, Charleston, SC, for Defendants.
PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Plaintiffs claim that the matter must be remanded to state court because no federal jurisdiction exists. The complaint asserts no federal issue of law and Plaintiffs assert complete diversity of citizenship is lacking because Plaintiffs and Defendants William M. Rhett, Jr. and Nancy Rhett are all citizens of South Carolina. Defendants claim that complete diversity exists because Defendants William M. Rhett, Jr. and Nancy Rhett are no longer parties to this, action. For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand is denied.
Plaintiffs Ralph B. Hanahan ("Hanahan") and Grey M. Geissler ("Geissler"), both citizens of South Carolina, filed an amended complaint in the Court of Common Pleas for Beaufort County on March 2, 2007. (Pls.' Ex. A.) This amended complaint commenced an action against, among others, the removing Defendants Jeffrey Covelli ("Covelli"), Brian Kreider ("Kreider"), and Haynes Brokerage Group ("HBG"). All three removing Defendants are citizens of jurisdictions other than South Carolina.1
The complaint alleged fourteen separate causes of action against Defendants stemming from their alleged participation in a scheme of wrongful conversion of certain property belonging to Geissler, an 87 year-old widow, and trusts set up for Geissler's benefit, as well as the wrongful procurement of a life insurance policy on Geissler. (Pls.' Ex. A.) A number of other Defendants to this action were acknowledged by both parties to be citizens of South Carolina.
Also on March 2, 2007, the state court entered a Consent Order between the Plaintiffs and Defendants William M. Rhett, Jr. and Nancy Rhett (collectively, "the Rhetts"). This Consent Order, entitled "Covenant Not To Execute and Agreement," stipulated that so long as the Rhetts complied with certain provisions of the agreement, Plaintiffs agreed to release the Rhetts from any liability they may face in the action. (Pls.' Ex. I.)
By July, the Plaintiffs had either dismissed or settled their claims with all remaining South Carolina Defendants.2 On August 6, 2007, the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Torres v. Johnson, Civil Action No. 18-10566-MGM
...from considering the citizenship of that defendant for purposes of determining diversity." Hanahan v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co., 518 F. Supp. 2d 780, 785 (D.S.C. 2007); see Estate of Martineau, 203 F.3d at 910 ("Federal courts must look to state law to determine whether removal i......
-
Nancy Doty, Inc. v. Fox Head, Inc., Case No. 3:19-cv-0405-Sl
...court finding that settlement was "final enough," without providing details); Hanahan v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co. (USA), 518 F. Supp. 2d 780, 785 (D.S.C. 2007) (Consent Order); Adams v. Estate of Keck, 210 F. Supp. 2d 863, 864 (W.D. Ky. 2002) (settlement agreement); Ratcliff v. ......
-
Scott v. S. Health Partners, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:18-00047-RMG
...diversity can arise, and the case canPage 7 then be removed to federal court." Hanahan v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co. (USA), 518 F. Supp. 2d 780, 784-85 (D.S.C. 2007) (citing Self v. General Motors Corp., 588 F.2d 655 (9th Cir.1978)). The question is "whether the settlement or dism......
-
Ashford v. Aeroframe Servs., LLC, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-992
...employees represented by the Law Firm." Id. 24. Mem. Ruling [Doc. 45], at 20 (quoting Hanahan v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co., Inc., 518 F.Supp.2d 780, 785 (D.S.C. 2007)). 25. Mem. Ruling [Doc. 45], at 18-19. 26. Id. at 19. 27. Id. 28. Mot. to Remand [Doc. 2], at...
-
Torres v. Johnson, Civil Action No. 18-10566-MGM
...from considering the citizenship of that defendant for purposes of determining diversity." Hanahan v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co., 518 F. Supp. 2d 780, 785 (D.S.C. 2007); see Estate of Martineau, 203 F.3d at 910 ("Federal courts must look to state law to determine whether removal i......
-
Nancy Doty, Inc. v. Fox Head, Inc., Case No. 3:19-cv-0405-Sl
...court finding that settlement was "final enough," without providing details); Hanahan v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co. (USA), 518 F. Supp. 2d 780, 785 (D.S.C. 2007) (Consent Order); Adams v. Estate of Keck, 210 F. Supp. 2d 863, 864 (W.D. Ky. 2002) (settlement agreement); Ratcliff v. ......
-
Scott v. S. Health Partners, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:18-00047-RMG
...diversity can arise, and the case canPage 7 then be removed to federal court." Hanahan v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co. (USA), 518 F. Supp. 2d 780, 784-85 (D.S.C. 2007) (citing Self v. General Motors Corp., 588 F.2d 655 (9th Cir.1978)). The question is "whether the settlement or dism......
-
Ashford v. Aeroframe Servs., LLC, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-992
...employees represented by the Law Firm." Id. 24. Mem. Ruling [Doc. 45], at 20 (quoting Hanahan v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co., Inc., 518 F.Supp.2d 780, 785 (D.S.C. 2007)). 25. Mem. Ruling [Doc. 45], at 18-19. 26. Id. at 19. 27. Id. 28. Mot. to Remand [Doc. 2], at...