Handshoe v. Perret
Citation | 270 F.Supp.3d 915 |
Decision Date | 19 September 2017 |
Docket Number | Civil No. 1:15CV382–HSO–JCG |
Parties | Douglas HANDSHOE, Plaintiff v. Vaughn PERRET, et al., Defendants |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Mississippi |
Douglas Handshoe, Wiggins, MS, Pro Se.
Jason B. Purvis, Purvis & Co., PLLC, Gulfport, MS, Douglas J. Gunn, Watkins & Eager, PLLC, Jackson, MS, for Defendants.
BEFORE THE COURT are three Motions: (1) a Motion to Dismiss [94] filed by Defendant Ashoka; (2) a Motion to Dismiss [96] filed by Defendants Vaughn Perret and Charles Leary; and (3) a Motion to Intervene [101] filed by Slabbed New Media, LLC. These Motions are fully briefed.
After due consideration of the Motions, the related pleadings, the record, and relevant legal authority, the Court finds that Ashoka's Motion to Dismiss [94] should be granted, that Perret and Leary's Motion to Dismiss [96] should be granted in part and denied in part, and that Slabbed New Media, LLC's Motion to Intervene [101] should be denied. All of Plaintiff's claims should be dismissed except for the misrepresentation claims pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 512(f) against Defendants Progress Media Group Limited and Marilyn Smulders contained in Count 3 of the Third Amended Complaint and against Defendants Charles Leary and Trout Point Lodge in Count 5. These two claims will remain.
Plaintiff Douglas Handshoe ("Plaintiff" or "Handshoe") alleges that he is the publisher of Slabbed New Media, LLC's "regionally noted website." 3d Am. Compl. [90] at 3. Plaintiff has been embroiled in litigation for years with certain of the Defendants in this case in various courts throughout the United States and Canada. According to the Third Amended Complaint, which is the operative pleading here, Trout Point Lodge Ltd. ("Trout Point Lodge"), Charles Leary ("Leary"), Vaughn Perret ("Perret"), and Daniel Abel ("Abel")1 have commenced three defamation suits against Plaintiff in his personal capacity in Nova Scotia, Canada. Id. at 11, 13.2
The Third Amended Complaint alleges that Defendants sent certain "takedown notices" pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 512, which is part of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA"),3 "in an attempt to force Plaintiff, as Publisher and agent for Slabbed New Media, LLC to take down constitutionally protected free speech in the form of journalistic posts to the Slabbed New Media LLC website ...." Id. at 4. Plaintiff maintains that these takedown notices were "directed to a Mississippi legal business entity and ultimately its publisher/owner in his personal capacity, creating impacts on the business of that entity and its publisher in his personal capacity, including causing injury leading to damages ...." Id. at 4–5.
Plaintiff maintains that the posts in question constituted journalistic reporting in the public interest related to a "massive political corruption scandal, resulting criminal investigation, conviction and incarceration of former Jefferson Parish[, Louisiana,] President Aaron Broussard," id. at 2, and that some posts were parodies created by Slabbed New Media, LLC, or third parties who gave express consent for Slabbed New Media, LLC, to publish the works. See, e.g. , id. at 22, 29, 40–44, 48.
However, according to the Third Amended Complaint, "Plaintiff in his personal capacity had no connection to the illustrative use of the photographs in question." Id. at 29. Slabbed New Media, LLC, as a journalistic website, and Plaintiff as publisher of that website, used "the creative works in the context of a public interest news story ... and journalistic reporting in the public interest ...." Id.
Plaintiff filed a pro se Civil Complaint for Damages, Declaratory, and Injunctive Relief [1] in this Court on November 16, 2015. Plaintiff has since filed three amended pleadings, two of which were filed after obtaining leave of Court to do so. The operative pleading is now the Third Amended Complaint [90], which advances eight counts of misrepresentation pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 512(f) related to takedown notices dated from December 2012 to January 2016. 3d Am. Compl. [90] at 33–47.
The Third Amended Complaint also seeks certain declarations, including that: (1) "to the extent Defendants own any valid copyright interest in the creative works in questions [sic] or have claimed to own any valid copyrights, Defendants have misused such copyrights rendering those Copyrights as unenforceable," id. at 49; (2) Plaintiff's "use of the photographs in question as agent for Slabbed New Media, LLC is lawful under the fair use doctrine and does not infringe on any of the Defendants' copyrights,"id. at 50; (3) "as a matter of law [Plaintiff] has no liability in his personal capacity over content belonging to a third party in which he acts as agent pursuant to the Mississippi Limited Liability Act," id. ; and (4) "as a matter of law each and every component judgment rendered in the case styled, Trout Point Lodge et al. v. Douglas Handshoe , Nova Scotia Supreme Court No. 41135 is REPUGNANT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and unenforceable in the United States of America," under the Securing the Protection of our Enduring and Established Constitutional Heritage Act, 28 U.S.C. § 4101 et seq. ("SPEECH Act"), id. at 52.
In total, nine takedown notices are at issue here. Each is summarized in a separate count of the Third Amended Complaint.4
Id. at 13–14; see also Notice [1–3] at 10–11 ( ).6
Count 2 asserts a § 512(f) claim for an initial takedown notice sent by Leary on December 14, 2012, which "dealt with the same image" as the December 13, 2012, notice. 3d Am. Compl. [90] at 14 n.4; see also Notice [1–3] at 21–22. Leary sent "separate notices for both the cropped original and scaled versions of that cropped original designed for mobile device optimization." 3d Am. Compl. [90] at 14 n.4.
3d Am. Compl. [90] at 41–42. At issue were "Slabbed New Media, LLC posts" that "were published to the Slabbed New Media website ...." Id. at 42.
Plaintiff alleges that each Slabbed New Media, LLC post is a "self-evident non-infringing fair use," id. at 33, 35, 42, and that he had no connection to these postings in his individual capacity, id. However, Plaintiff asserts that he incurred damages when the service providers terminated access to the Slabbed New Media, LLC, posts that were subject to these takedown notices. Id. at 34, 36, 43–44.
Count 3 raises a claim under § 512(f) against Progress Media and Smulders. 3d Am. Compl. [90] at 36. Plaintiff refers to Progress Media as a Canadian media outlet with which Smulders is apparently associated, although there is little information in the record as to the identity of these two foreign Defendants, neither of whom has entered an appearance in this case. Id. at 23.
The Third Amended Complaint alleges that "[t]he Takedown Notice of December 14, 2012 represented that Publisher Handshoe and Slabbed New Media, LLC's post infringed copyrights owned by Progress Media Group Limited and Marilyn Smulders on whose behalf the Canadian lawyer swore he was authorized to act." Id. at 36–37. The post was a "picture of defendants Leary, Perret and Abel that was posted to the Slabbed New Media website ...." Id. at 15. Plaintiff again claims "[t]he Slabbed New Media, LLC posts is [sic] a self-evident non-infringing fair...
To continue reading
Request your trial