Hangers v. Bank of Amer., No. 98-55089
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Ollason, Hargrove and Jones |
| Citation | 196 F.3d 1292 |
| Parties | (9th Cir. 1999) In re: DALE E. HANGER; SANDRA S. HANGER, Debtors, DALE E. HANGER; SANDRA S. HANGER, Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, Appellee |
| Docket Number | No. 98-55089 |
| Decision Date | 15 September 1999 |
Page 1292
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, Appellee.
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
D.C. No. CC-97-01179-OlHarJo
Ollason, Hargrove and Jones, Judges, Presiding
Before: Betty B. Fletcher and Harry Pregerson, Circuit Judges, and Charles R. Weiner, 1 Senior District Judge.
COUNSEL: Joseph A. Weber, Santa Ana, California; Fritz J. Firman, and Brian W. Baron, Law Offices of Joseph A. Weiner, Costa Mesa, California, for appellants Dale E. Hanger and Sandra S. Hanger. Larry G. Ivanjack, Gary Tokumori, Ivanjack and Lambirth, Los Angeles, California, for appellee Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association.
The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit, in a published opinion, In re Hanger, 217 B.R. 592 (9th Cir. BAP 1997), held that Appellee Bank of America, National Trust and Savings Association retained a secured claim in the amount of $33,183. As that decision correctly applied Bankruptcy Code section 522(f)(2)(A), 11 U.S.C. S 522(f)(2)(A), which provides a statutory calculation to determine when a lien is avoidable, the decision of the BAP is AFFIRMED.
---------------
Notes:
1 Honorable Charles R. Weiner, Senior United States District Judge, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.
---------------
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Daventree Ltd. v. Republic of Azerbaijan, No. 02 Civ. 6356(SHS).
...as "minimum contacts" to subject a non-resident bank to jurisdiction. See e.g., Soma Med. Int'l v. Standard Chartered Bank, 196 F.3d 1292, 1298-99 (10th Cir.1999); T.J. Raney & Sons, Inc. v. Security S & L Assoc. of Salina, Kansas, 749 F.2d 523, 525 (8th Cir.1984); Dollar ......
-
Dtex, LLC v. Bbva Bancomer, S.A., No. 7:04-2273-13.
...presence necessary to establish personal jurisdiction over a foreign bank. See, e.g., Soma Med. Int'l v. Standard Chartered Bank, 196 F.3d 1292, 1299 (10th Cir.1999) (personal jurisdiction lacking because a foreign defendant could not "expect to be haled into court" in the forum b......
-
Dagesse v. Plant Hotel N.V., No. CIV. 98-713-B.
...have used the framework when determining whether general jurisdiction exists. See, e.g., Soma Med. Int'l v. Standard Chartered Bank, 196 F.3d 1292, 1295-96 (10th Cir.1999); Harbuck v. Aramco, Inc., No. CIV. A. 99-1971, 1999 WL 999431, at *5 (E.D.Pa. Oct. 21, 1999); Molnlycke, 64 F.Supp.2d a......
-
Caiazzo v. American Royal Arts Corp., No. 4D09–5152.
...293 F.3d 506, 513 (D.C.Cir.2002); Mink v. AAAA Dev. LLC, 190 F.3d 333, 336–37 (5th Cir.1999); Soma Med. Int'l v. Standard Chartered Bank, 196 F.3d 1292, 1296–97 (10th Cir.1999). 9. We note that Zippo was a federal district court case out of Pennsylvania, the reasoning of which has never bee......
-
Daventree Ltd. v. Republic of Azerbaijan, No. 02 Civ. 6356(SHS).
...as "minimum contacts" to subject a non-resident bank to jurisdiction. See e.g., Soma Med. Int'l v. Standard Chartered Bank, 196 F.3d 1292, 1298-99 (10th Cir.1999); T.J. Raney & Sons, Inc. v. Security S & L Assoc. of Salina, Kansas, 749 F.2d 523, 525 (8th Cir.1984); Dollar ......
-
Dtex, LLC v. Bbva Bancomer, S.A., No. 7:04-2273-13.
...presence necessary to establish personal jurisdiction over a foreign bank. See, e.g., Soma Med. Int'l v. Standard Chartered Bank, 196 F.3d 1292, 1299 (10th Cir.1999) (personal jurisdiction lacking because a foreign defendant could not "expect to be haled into court" in the forum b......
-
Dagesse v. Plant Hotel N.V., No. CIV. 98-713-B.
...have used the framework when determining whether general jurisdiction exists. See, e.g., Soma Med. Int'l v. Standard Chartered Bank, 196 F.3d 1292, 1295-96 (10th Cir.1999); Harbuck v. Aramco, Inc., No. CIV. A. 99-1971, 1999 WL 999431, at *5 (E.D.Pa. Oct. 21, 1999); Molnlycke, 64 F.Supp.2d a......
-
Caiazzo v. American Royal Arts Corp., No. 4D09–5152.
...293 F.3d 506, 513 (D.C.Cir.2002); Mink v. AAAA Dev. LLC, 190 F.3d 333, 336–37 (5th Cir.1999); Soma Med. Int'l v. Standard Chartered Bank, 196 F.3d 1292, 1296–97 (10th Cir.1999). 9. We note that Zippo was a federal district court case out of Pennsylvania, the reasoning of which has never bee......