Hanks v. CRC Holston, Inc.

Decision Date23 September 1983
Docket NumberNo. 83-C-1446,83-C-1446
Citation438 So.2d 576
PartiesKurt HANKS v. CRC HOLSTON, INC., et al.
CourtLouisiana Supreme Court

In re CRC Holston, Inc., et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review.Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Jefferson Davis.Thirty-first Judicial District Court.No. C-440-82. 430 So.2d 1340.

Denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Charles v. Travelers Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • November 29, 1993
    ...Bechtel Power Corp., 420 So.2d 1337 (La.App. 3d Cir.1982); Lonzo v. Town of Marksville, 430 So.2d 1088 (La.App. 3d Cir.), writ denied, 438 So.2d 576 (1983); and Beaty v. Thiokol Corp., 414 So.2d 1292 (La.App. 2d Cir.), writ denied, 416 So.2d 114 (1982).13 See the medical sources cited supra......
  • Reid v. Gamb, Inc.
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • June 22, 1987
    ...Mutual Insurance Company, 318 So.2d 15 (La.1975); Lonzo v. Town of Marksville, 430 So.2d 1088 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1983); writ denied 438 So.2d 576 (La.1983). Reid v. Gamb, Inc., 499 So.2d at The court of appeal also concluded correctly that, because Reid was required to stay overnight in Donal......
  • Keahey v. Osborne Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • February 26, 1986
    ...Corporation, 285 So.2d 536 (La.1973); Ward v. Pennington, 434 So.2d 1131 (La.App. 1st Cir.1983), writ denied, 438 So.2d 572 and 438 So.2d 576 (La.1983). 5 An agency is created expressly by the written or oral agreement between the parties. AAA Tire & Export v. Big Chief Truck, 385 So.2d 426......
  • Raborn v. Raborn, 2013 CA 1211
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • November 13, 2014
    ...by authority from the latter. Ward v. Pennington, 434 So. 2d 1131, 1137 (La. App. 1 Cir. 1983), writs denied, 438 So. 2d 572 and 438 So. 2d 576 (La. 1983). There is absolutely nothing in the record to suggest that Layne Raborn is an agent for appellant. While the answer of appellant reveals......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT