Hanna v. City of Chicago

Docket Number15-3305
Decision Date22 August 2016

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
53 cases
  • Appvion, Inc. Ret. Savings & Emp. Stock Ownership Plan v. Buth
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin
    • 27 Julio 2020
    ...pleading requirements of Rule 9(b) by alleging "the who, what, when, where, and how" of the fraud." United States ex rel. Hanna v. City of Chicago , 834 F.3d 775, 779 (7th Cir. 2016) (citations omitted). When a plaintiff sues multiple defendants, the general rule is that the plaintiff must ......
  • Mission Measurement Corp. v. Blackbaud, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • 13 Diciembre 2017
    ...v. Ukrainian Vill. Pharmacy, Inc. , 772 F.3d 1102, 1106 (7th Cir. 2014) (citation omitted); see also United States ex. rel. Hanna v. City of Chicago , 834 F.3d 775, 779 (7th Cir. 2016). Allegations based on information and belief will not suffice under Rule 9(b) unless "(1) the facts consti......
  • Gierum v. Glick (In re Glick)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • 8 Junio 2017
    ...Geinosky v. City of Chicago , 675 F.3d 743, 745 n.1 (7th Cir. 2012), and do not concern fraud, United States ex rel. Hanna v. City of Chicago , 834 F.3d 775, 779 (7th Cir. 2016).The facts come from Gierum's sprawling amended complaint and its exhibits. Even greatly distilled, these facts ma......
  • Appvion, Inc. v. Buth
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • 23 Abril 2024
    ...of the misrepresentation, and the method by which the misrepresentation was communicated to the plaintiff." U.S. ex rel. Hanna v. City of Chicago, 834 F.3d 775, 779 (7th Cir. 2016) (quoting U.S. ex rel. Grenadyor v. Ukrainian Vill. Pharmacy, Inc., 772 F.3d 1102, 1106 (7th Cir. 2014)). That ......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • False Claims Act: 2016 Year in Review
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 10 Enero 2017
    ...the actions of multiple defendants who are alleged to have engaged in precisely the same conduct.” U.S. ex rel. Hanna v. City of Chicago, 834 F.3d 775 (7th Cir. Aug. 22, 2016) In Hanna, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision to grant defendant City of Chicago’s motion fo......
  • 10 Key FCA Developments Of 2016
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 2 Febrero 2017
    ...of case pled in part on personal knowledge for failure to plead with sufficient particularity); United States ex rel. Hanna v. City of Chicago, 834 F.3d 775 (7th Cir. Aug. 22, 2016) (affirmed grant of summary judgment for defendant for failure to plead with sufficient particularity); United......