Hannan v. First Nat. Bank of Council Bluffs, Iowa
Decision Date | 06 December 1920 |
Docket Number | 5537. |
Citation | 269 F. 527 |
Parties | HANNAN, County Auditor, et al. v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF COUNCIL BLUFFS, IOWA. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
C. E Swanson, of Council Bluffs, Iowa (V. A. Morgan, of Council Bluffs, Iowa, on the brief), for appellants.
Addison G. Kistle, of Council Bluffs, Iowa (Tinley, Mitchell, Pryor Ross & Mitchell, on the brief), for appellee.
Before SANBORN and CARLAND, Circuit Judges, and MUNGER, District judge.
This case presents an appeal from a decree enjoining the collection of taxes. The appellee, a national bank at Council Bluffs, Iowa, alleged that an attempted assessment for the years 1914 and 1915 had been made against its shareholders based on the entire value of such shares, and without deducting from the value of the shares the amount of bonds of the United States which the bank owned. It further alleged that the tax was void, because no tax could be levied against the shares of stock in the state and savings banks, under the Iowa statutes. There was a denial of the allegations and a trial to the court.
A preliminary question of the jurisdiction of the court arises inasmuch as the tax assessed to any one shareholder does not amount to the sum of over $3,000. The statutes of Iowa in reference to taxation of banks and bank shares are in part as follows (Code Supp. Iowa 1907, and Code Supp. Iowa 1913, Secs. 1321, 1322, 1325):
Section 1321: 'Private Bankers. Private banks or bankers, or any persons other than corporations hereinafter specified, a part of whose business is the receiving of deposits subject to check, on certificates, receipts, or otherwise, or the selling of exchange, shall prepare and furnish to the assessor a sworn statement, showing the assets, aside from real estate, and liabilities of such bank or banker on January 1st of the current year, as follows:
It will be observed that by the last section quoted the bank is made liable for the payment of the taxes assessed to its stockholders under penalties, and that it may be collected as other taxes, or by action in the name of the county. The bank may recover such payments from the stockholders and is given a lien on the stock and unpaid dividends for the amount paid. The validity of statutes imposing such liability on national banks for the taxes levied against their shareholders is beyond question. National Bank v. Commonwealth, 9 Wall. 353, 362, 19 L.Ed. 701; Aberdeen Bank v. Chehalis County, 166 U.S. 440, 444, 17 Sup.Ct. 629, 41 L.Ed. 1069; Citizens' Nat. Bank v. Kentucky, 217 U.S. 443, 451, 30 Sup.Ct. 532, 54 L.Ed. 832. As a pecuniary liability is imposed on the bank for the payment of the total amount of the tax imposed on all its stockholders, it is the real party in interest in a suit to enjoin the collection from the assets, a collection which is in effect an enforced declaration of a dividend. Redhead v. Iowa Nat. Bank, 127 Iowa, 572, 103 N.W. 796.
In the case of Cummings v. National Bank, 101 U.S. 153, 156 (25 L.Ed. 903), the same claim of the incapacity of the bank to sue because only the shareholders were interested was considered, and it was decided that the bank might maintain such a suit as this under a similar statute of Ohio, but less burdensome on the bank because it declared that the bank might pay the tax, whereas this statute declares that the bank must pay it. In that case the court said:
'But the Ohio statute, by the remedies it provides, places the bank in a condition where it must pay the tax, or encounter other evils of a character which create a right to avoid them by instituting legal proceedings to ascertain the extent of its responsibility before it does the acts demanded by the statute.'
The bank, therefore, had the right to maintain the suit, and as the total amount due from it far exceeded the sum of $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs, the court had jurisdiction of the controversy.
It was shown that appellee was the owner of a large amount of bonds of the United States at the time of the assessments and that no deduction was allowed from the value of the shares because of that fact. One of the principal questions that is presented goes beyond the relationship of these bonds to the asserted tax, as the appellee denies the authority of the state to levy any tax against the bank or the shares of stock therein. The statute of the United States which relates to the taxation of national banks is section 5219 of the Revised Statutes (section 9784, U.S. Comp. Stats. Ann.). It is contained in the chapter relating to the creation and regulation of these banks and is as follows:
It is contended by appellee that section 1322 of the Iowa statutes requires the taxation of the property of incorporated banks and not of the shares of stock therein....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Roberts v. American Nat. Bank of Pensacola
... ... 103, 106, 44 S.Ct. 23, 68 L.Ed ... 191; First National Bank of Guthrie Center v ... Anderson, 269 U.S ... national and state banks. See Hannan v. First Nat. Bank ... (C. C. A.) 269 F. 527; City of ... ...
-
Iowa Nat. Bank v. Stewart
...Bank v. Achenbach, 110 Okl. 246, 237 P. 574;McFarland v. Central National Bank (C. C. A.) 26 F.(2d) 890;Hannan v. First National Bank of Council Bluffs (C. C. A.) 269 F. 527;First National Bank of Watertown v. Eddy, 47 S. D. 297, 198 N. W. 554;National Bank of Commerce v. City of New Bedfor......
-
Iowa Nat. Bank v. Stewart
...300 F. 29; First Nat. Bank v. Achenbach (Okla.) 110 Okla. 246, 237 P. 574; McFarland v. Central Nat. Bank, 26 F.2d 890; Hannan v. First Nat. Bank, 269 F. 527; First Nat. Bank v. Eddy (S. D.), 47 S.D. 297, N.W. 554; National Bank of Commerce v. City of New Bedford (Mass.), 155 Mass. 313, 29 ......
-
Stevenson v. Metsker
... ... TAXATION--Shares ... of Bank Stock--Discrimination. Shares of state bank stock ... that the first half of the taxes assessed against the real ... the case of Central Nat. Bank v. McFarland, 20 F.2d ... 416, and 26 ... Bank v. Durr, 246 F. 163; Hannan v. First Nat ... Bank, 269 F. 527; Hoglan v ... 240; Head ... v. Board, 170 Iowa 300, 152 N.W. 600; Deposit Bank ... of ... ...