Hansen v. Du Pont De Nemours Company, 758

Decision Date05 May 1930
Docket NumberNo. 758,758
Citation74 L.Ed. 1162,50 S.Ct. 354,281 U.S. 751
PartiesEmil HANSEN, Permanent Receiver of Syracuse Sand Company, Inc., petitioner, v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, Inc. 1
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Mr. Emil Hansen, pro se.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

1 The order sought to be reviewed here was a denial of motion to retax costs and no opinion thereon was filed in the court below. See, also, 33 F.(2d) 74 and 280 U. S. 589, 50 S. Ct. 37, 74 L. Ed. —.

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • De Cew v. Union Bag & Paper Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • 16 Agosto 1944
    ... ... been in public use in the mill of the Falulah Paper Company for more than two years prior to the plaintiff's ... 84, 62 S.Ct. 37, 86 L.Ed. 58; Hansen v. Slick, 3 Cir., 230 F. 627; Atlantic Refining Co. v ... ...
  • Lindquist v. Kansas City Public Service Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 4 Enero 1943
    ... ... Kansas City Public Service Company, a Corporation, and P. Setzler & Sons Soda Water ... ...
  • Selser v. Bragmans Bluff Lumber Co., Inc
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • 13 Marzo 1933
    ...Liability Ins. Co. v. McCaffrey (C. C. A.) 37 F.2d 870, 872 (in which writ was refused by the United States Supreme Court, 281 U.S. 751, 50 S.Ct. 354, 74 L.Ed. 1162). Plaintiff argues that as the contract was entered between the deceased, a resident of the state of Louisiana, and the defend......
  • Baldwin v. Byrne
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 7 Febrero 1939
    ...the State of Connecticut is objectionable as pointed out in American Mutual Liability Company v. McCaffrey, 37 F.2d 870, certiorari denied 281 U.S. 751. Decedent was employed in interstate commerce at the time his death. Jurisdiction of the case was in the Federal government and not in the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT