Hansen v. Janitschek
| Decision Date | 22 February 1960 |
| Docket Number | No. A--82,A--82 |
| Citation | 158 A.2d 329,31 N.J. 545 |
| Parties | Minnie HANSEN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Adolph JANITSCHEK, individually, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellants. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Joseph C. Glavin, Jersey City, for appellant.
Louis Auerbacher, Jr., Newark, for respondent (Samuel R. Blaine, Newark, on the brief).
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Conford in that court, and the matter is remanded to the trial judge who heard the case for reconsideration and a new determination.
For reversal: Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO--7.
For affirmance: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
13 cases
-
United Jersey Bank v. Wolosoff
...A.2d 1202 (App.Div.1977); Hansen v. Janitschek, 57 N.J.Super. 418, 433, 154 A.2d 855 (App.Div.1959), rev'd on dissenting opinion 31 N.J. 545, 158 A.2d 329 (1960); Palatini v. Sarian, 15 N.J.Super. 34, 42, 83 A.2d 24 (App.Div.1951). Stated somewhat differently, the privilege accords the shie......
-
Farber, Matter of
...State v. Jamison, 64 N.J. 363, 375, 316 A.2d 439 (1974); In re Richardson, 31 N.J. 391, 396-397, 157 A.2d 695 (1960); Hansen v. Janitschek, 31 N.J. 545, 158 A.2d 329 (1960) rev'g on dissenting opinion of Conford, J., 57 N.J.Super. 418, 433, 154 A.2d 855 (App.Div.1959); L.J. v. J.B., 150 N.J......
-
Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum Served by Sussex County Grand Jury on Farber, Matter of
...1202 (App.Div.1977); Hansen v. Janitschek, 57 N.J.Super. 418, 433, 154 A.2d 855 (App.Div.1959), rev'd on dissenting opinion, 31 N.J. 545, 158 A.2d 329 (1960); Palatini v. Sarian, 15 N.J.Super. 34, 42, 83 A.2d 24 (App.Div.1951). Stated somewhat differently, the privilege accords the shield o......
-
Grossman Furniture Co. v. Pierre
...position of the parties. Hansen v. Janitschek, 57 N.J.Super. 418, 154 A.2d 855 (App.Div.1959), rev'd on another ground, 31 N.J. 545, 158 A.2d 329 (1960), is relevant. The applicable facts are Briefly stated, the court concluded plaintiff had proved that plaintiff and her brothers were part ......
Request a trial to view additional results