O'Hara v. State
Decision Date | 11 April 1899 |
Citation | 121 Ala. 28,25 So. 622 |
Parties | O'HARA v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from city court of Montgomery; A. D. Sayre, Judge.
James O'Hara was convicted of doing business as an auctioneer without a license, and he appeals. Affirmed.
Gordon Macdonald, for appellant.
Charles G. Brown, Atty. Gen., for the State.
The appellant, James O'Hara, was indicted, tried, and convicted for doing business as an auctioneer in the city of Montgomery without a license, in violation of section 35 of the approved February 18, 1897 (Acts 1896-97, p 1505). The defendant demurred to the indictment on the ground that said act is unconstitutional and void, assigning (1) that it is an attempt to discriminate between individuals engaged in the same occupation, in that it imposes a license tax on some auctioneers, and does not impose it upon others (2) that said act was not passed by the general assembly, for that it is not shown by the journal of the house of representatives to have been signed by the speaker thereof in the presence of the house; and (3) that the journals of the house show that amendments to said act passed by the senate were not adopted by an aye and nay vote of the majority of the house of representatives. The demurrer was overruled, and that action of the city court is the only matter presented for review by this appeal.
There is no merit in the first assignment of demurrer above stated (Ph nix Carpet Co. v. State [Ala.] 22 So. 627), nor in the third (Ex parte Howard-Harrison Iron Co. [Ala.] 24 So 516). Whether the act was signed by the speaker in the presence of the house-the inquiry raised by the second assignment-is to be determined by an examination of the journal of the house, upon which the organic law requires the fact of signing to be entered. Const. art. 4. § 27. Bearing upon, and directly upon, this matter, the house journal shows the following: First, a message from the senate to the house beginning thus: Then follows the identification of 15 or 20 senate bills by their numbers and captions, and the message is signed, "John F. Proctor, Secretary." Immediately after this is the following: And immediately succeeding this the journal continues as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. State
...the effect to render the act void. 185 U.S. 203, 22 Sup.Ct. 616, 46 L.Ed. 872; 186 Ill. 134, 57 N.E. 880, 56 L.R.A. 266. See, also, 121 Ala. 28, 25 So. 622; Ala. 149, 46 So. 237; 147 Ala. 682, 39 So. 353; 148 Ala. 539, 41 So. 970; 94 Ala. 156, 10 So. 534; 5 Ala.App. 231, 59 So. 741; 53 Ala.......
-
Rash Below v. Benjamin B. Allen, Complainant Below. Howard D. Ross, Below v. Charles M. Allmond, Complainant Below
...journal entry States of Nebraska ( In re Granger, 56 Neb. 260, 76 N.W. 588; State vs. Frank, 60 Neb. 327, 83 N.W. 74) and Alabama (121 Ala. 28, 25 So. 622) also adhere to this of the doctrine. Illinois, the author of the doctrine, has likewise receded from the position it first assumed, and......
- State ex rel. Hynds v. Cahill
-
Warrior Water Co. v. Long
... ... the first year's business. Any person, firm or ... corporation establishing a new public utility shall pay to ... the state the sum of one hundred dollars, and shall also at ... the same time execute a bond, payable to the state of ... Alabama, to insure payment of ... ...