Hardee v. Pennsylvania Nat. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 20 November 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 56941,56941 |
Citation | 251 S.E.2d 132,148 Ga.App. 178 |
Parties | HARDEE v. PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Albert E. Butler, Jesup, for appellant.
Dickey, Whelchel, Miles & Brown, Richard A. Brown, Jr., Brunswick, for appellees.
The administrative law judge, and then the full board, found adversely to the claimant. The superior court affirmed the award. There was sufficient competent evidence to support the award, and under the "any evidence" rule the judgment of the superior court must be affirmed. The "any evidence" rule is applicable to claimants as well as to employers. Kissel v. Aetna Cas. etc. Co., 136 Ga.App. 504, 221 S.E.2d 645 (1975); Carroll v. Mission Ins. Co., 147 Ga.App. 262, 248 S.E.2d 542 (1978).
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial- Gregory v. State, 56915
-
Insurance Co. of North America v. Hartl
...support the award, and under the "any evidence" rule the judgment of the superior court must be affirmed. Hardee v. Pa. Nat. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co., 148 Ga.App. 178, 251 S.E.2d 132 (1978); Kissel v. Aetna Cas. etc. Co., 136 Ga.App. 504, 221 S.E.2d 645 Judgment affirmed. UNDERWOOD and CARLEY, JJ......