Harder & Hafer Coal Min. Co. of Sullivan County, Ind. v. Schmidt
Decision Date | 02 October 1900 |
Docket Number | 651. |
Citation | 104 F. 282 |
Parties | HARDER & HAFER COAL MIN. CO. OF SULLIVAN COUNTY, IND., v. SCHMIDT. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
O. W Dynes, for plaintiff in error.
Cyrus J. Wood, for defendant in error.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Northern District of Illinois.
The defendant in error was the plaintiff in the court below, and obtained a verdict and judgment against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, in the sum of two thousand eight hundred and ninety-five dollars damages for personal injuries received by the defendant in error in the mines of the plaintiff in error. The principal error relied upon is that the court refused, at the conclusion of the testimony, on motion of the plaintiff in error, to instruct the jury to find a verdict for the plaintiff in error.
The evidence was somewhat contradictory, but the facts found by the verdict of the jury, upon the instructions given, and supported by a sufficient weight of evidence, may be stated as follows:
The plaintiff in error was, on the 20th of December, 1894, a corporation under the laws of Indiana, conducting a coal mining business in Sullivan county in that state.
The general plan of the mines, so far as it need be considered is, in substance: A long horizontal passageway called the 'main entry' runs north and south past the foot of the hoisting shaft. This passageway is used for drawing cars of coal to the shaft. Other similar passageways used for the same purpose are cut at right angles to the main entry or passageway, and they also run in a horizontal direction, and the coal cars are drawn in them from the 'rooms' where the miners excavate the coal, over to the main entry where they turn and traverse the main entry to the hoisting shaft. These latter passageways, which run east and west, or at right angles to the main passageway or entry, are high enough for a man to walk in and wide enough for cars to be pulled through, averaging from six to nine feet in width.
From these east and west passageways the miners bore into the coal veins at regular intervals or distances along the passageway and make what are called 'rooms.' The room is made by excavating or removing the coal, and it is in these rooms that the actual mining work of dislodging coal is performed.
Before the room is made, there is a piece of technical work performed called 'turning the room,' which means making a doorway from the passage into the room. This is done by picking or blasting a hole about four feet wide and four feet high into the side of the passageway, a distance of about six feet. When the miner clears out such a hole he may then remove the coal lying beyond and open up the area called the 'room.'
Sections 7472 and 7479 of the Mining Act of Indiana (Burns' Rev. St. 1894) are as follows:
In the operation of these mines the miners were paid sixty cents a ton for the coal mined and loaded, and two dollars for turning the room. In a general way, a miner, with his help or buddy, worked a room, each other miner, with his help or buddy, working some other room; but occasionally a miner had more than one helper, especially when he wished to help one who was waiting for a place as an employee.
The plaintiff, Herman Schmidt, was a practical coal miner of about twenty-four years experience, but had been employed in the defendant's mine for about two weeks. With his buddy, he was engaged in mining coal from one of the rooms.
On the day when the accident occurred the mine was shut down to such an...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Swords v. McDonell
... ... from the District Court of Ward County; LEIGHTON, J ... Action ... St. Rep. 492, 33 N.W. 395; Paule v. Florence Min ... Co. 80 Wis. 350, 50 N.W. 189; Welch v ... 175; Stuart v. New Albany Mfg. Co. 15 ... Ind.App. 184, 43 N.E. 961; Burke v. Davis, 191 Mass ... pp. 3960-3974; ... Graham v. Newburg Orrel Coal & Coke Co. 38 W.Va ... 273, 18 S.E. 584; Harder & H. Coal Min. Co. v ... Schmidt, 43 C. C. A. 532, 104 F. 282, 9 Am. Neg. Rep ... ...
-
Warehime v. Huseby
... ... from the District Court of Williams County", Honorable Frank ... E. Fisk, Judge ... \xC2" ... S.W. R. Co. v ... Hunsucker, 33 Ind.App. 27, 70 N.E. 556 ... If ... 109, ... note; Petaja v. Aurora Iron Min. Co., 106 Mich. 463, ... 32 L.R.A. 435, 58 Am ... Swanson v ... Schmidt-Gulack Elevator Co., 22 N.D. 571, 135 N.W. 207; ... St. Rep. 176, 22 ... N.E. 631; Texas & P. Coal Co. v. Daves, 41 Tex. Civ. App ... 289, 92 S.W ... W.Va. 273, 18 S.E. 584; Harder & H. Coal Min. Co. v ... Schmidt, 43 C. C. A ... ...
-
Ostertag v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
...Eng. Ency. Law (2 Ed.), p. 488. (2) The plaintiff was entitled to protection as an employee. Ellsworth v. Metheney, 104 F. 119; Mining Co. v. Schmidt, 104 F. 282; Hammil v. Railroad, 93 Ky. 343; Schumacher v. Breweries Co., 247 Mo. 153; Tetwiler v. Railroad, 242 Mo. 178; Read v. Railroad, 9......
-
WESTERN AMERICAN CO. [*1, Green v. Western American Co.
... ... from superior court, Pierce county; W. O. Chapman, Judge ... Action ... Andrew Green, a coal miner, against the Western American ... consideration in Mining Co. v. Schmidt, 43 C. C. A ... 532, 104 F. 282, the ... Dec. 210; ... Railroad Co. v. Sullivan, 63 Ill. 293; Stone Co ... v. Whalen, ... 392; Railway Co ... v. Ruby, 38 Ind. 294, 10 Am. Rep. 111. Specific acts of ... ...