Hardin v. Macon Mall, 67313

Citation315 S.E.2d 4,169 Ga.App. 793
Decision Date04 January 1984
Docket NumberNo. 67313,67313
PartiesHARDIN et al. v. MACON MALL et al.
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals (Georgia)

Joe O. Mangum III, Milledgeville, for appellants.

John C. Edwards, Macon, for appellees.

QUILLIAN, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Bill Hardin, d/b/a Bill Hardin Music, appeals from judgment for the plaintiff, The Macon Mall, entered on a jury verdict. Macon Mall and Hardin entered into a written lease for designated premises within the mall for a fifteen-year term on April 19, 1974. Hardin was evicted for non-payment of rent on May 30, 1980 in a dispossessory proceeding which granted the landlord, Macon Mall, possession of the premises. Judgment for back rent was obtained which covered rent through June 1980. The present action was brought in 1982 seeking additional "lost rent" for the period 1 July, 1980 through June 1982, when a new tenant entered into a lease with Macon Mall for the demised premises. The jury found for plaintiff and the trial court denied defendant's motions for new trial and judgment n.o.v. Held:

1. Defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his motions. We find no error. The thrust of defendant's arguments is that the landlord was not entitled to recover rent accruing after he was evicted. He relies upon W. James Wilson & Assoc. v. Kelley, 143 Ga.App. 271, 272, 238 S.E.2d 270, which held: "Eviction of the tenant and re-entry by the landlord terminated the lease." We find this authority is not controlling under the facts of this case.

Hardin contracted with Macon Mall in the lease that "[i]n case of any such default [which included non-payment of rent], re-entry, expiration and/or dispossession by summary proceedings or otherwise all rents and other charges shall become due thereupon and be paid up to the time of such re-entry, dispossess and/or expiration and Landlord may relet the Demised Premises or any part or parts thereof, either in the name of Landlord or otherwise, for a term which may at Landlord's option be less than or exceed the period which would otherwise have constituted the balance of the Lease Term ... and Tenant ... shall also pay Landlord, as liquidated damages for the failure of Tenant to observe and perform said Tenant's covenants herein contained, for each month of the period which would otherwise have constituted the balance of the Lease Term, any deficiency between (i) the sum of one monthly installment of Minimum Rent ... and all charges that otherwise would have become due and (ii) the net amount, if any, of the rents collected on account of the lease of the Demised premises for ... the balance of the Lease Term." In essence this portion of the lease provides that the landlord shall be entitled to liquidated damages for the breach of the lease by the tenant, for each month, any deficiency between (1) the amount due that month, and (2) the amount collected for that month.

"Absent a limiting statute or controlling public policy, parties may contract with one another on whatever terms they wish (Cits.) and the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT