Hardison v. State, 80-158
| Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
| Writing for the Court | HOBSON; SCHEB, C. J., and CAMPBELL |
| Citation | 385 So.2d 738 |
| Parties | James D. HARDISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Docket Number | No. 80-158,80-158 |
| Decision Date | 09 July 1980 |
Page 738
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, St. Petersburg, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Eula Tuttle Mason, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
HOBSON, Judge.
James D. Hardison appeals from the judgment entered upon his nolo contendere plea to manslaughter. The appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress certain statements and the results of a blood alcohol test.
We are unable to determine the appellant's appeal on the merits. Under Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla.1979), only legally dispositive issues may be reserved for appeal following a nolo contendere plea. We find that the appellant did not reserve a legally dispositive issue, and therefore is not entitled to an appeal.
Page 739
The appellant's plea was entered after the Brown decision. While we have remanded cases involving pre-Brown pleas with instructions that the appellant be afforded an opportunity to seek to withdraw his plea, see Pittman v. State, 382 So.2d 1227 (Fla.2d DCA 1980), denying rehearing, such an order is not appropriate to post-Brown pleas. The opportunity to withdraw was predicated in pre-Brown pleas upon the notion that it would be unfair to punish a defendant for his reliance on pre-Brown cases. However, after the rendition of the Brown decision a defendant can no longer justifiably claim that he was not aware that an issue reserved for appeal following a plea of nolo contendere must be dispositive.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and the appellant need not be afforded an opportunity to withdraw his plea.
SCHEB, C. J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Finney v. State, 79-1936
...gained from counsel or the trial judge, that a preserved issue is legally dispositive and an appeal is viable. See Hardison v. State, 385 So.2d 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) (dismissing appeal without affording appellant right to withdraw his plea entered after Brown); Campbell v. State, 386 So.2d......
-
Weber v. State, 85-2271
...5th DCA 1985); Finney v. State, 420 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Sune v. State, 402 So.2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Hardison v. State, 385 So.2d 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Arnold v. State, 379 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 2d DCA The only case unearthed by this court's research which actually reached the mer......
-
Turner v. State, AL-173
...the full appellate review upon which his plea was conditioned." Page 320 Alexander v. State, 399 So.2d at 110, citing, Hardison v. State, 385 So.2d 738 (Fla. 2d DCA In refusing to allow appellant an opportunity to withdraw his plea, we acknowledge that our opinion appears to conflict with C......
-
Everett v. State, s. 86-2692
...the case." State v. Carr, 438 So.2d 826 (Fla.1983). Thus, in the light of Brown and consistent with our decisions in Hardison v. State, 385 So.2d 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), and Arnold v. State, 379 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), we would be warranted in dismissing the instant appeals. We have ......