Hargadine-McKittrick Dry-Goods Company v. Swofford Brothers Dry-Goods Company

Decision Date01 January 1901
Docket Number836.[*]
Citation63 P. 281,10 Kan.App. 198
PartiesHARGADINE-MCKITTRICK DRY-GOODS COMPANY v. SWOFFORD BROTHERS DRY-GOODS COMPANY
CourtKansas Court of Appeals

Decided January, 1901.

Error from Douglas district court; S. A. RIGGS, judge.

Judgment affirmed.

SYLLABUS

1. CONTRACTS -- Assumption of Indebtedness -- Rights of Parties. Where a mercantile company, in consideration of the surrender to it of large valuable property rights, upon a part of which it has a mortgage, assumes and agrees to pay the mercantile indebtedness of the mortgagor, the mercantile company cannot have and hold all of the benefits and property accruing to it in consequence of the transaction and repudiate its agreement to pay mercantile creditors on account of the alleged fraud of the assignor in concealing the true amount of his indebtedness.

2. -- Fraud -- Remedies. The mercantile company, upon discovering the fraud, had two remedies: it could have repudiated the whole transaction, restored the status quo, and been relieved of all of the obligations of the contract; or it could have affirmed the contract and borne the obligations imposed, and had recourse upon the mortgagor for damages sustained on account of his fraud and deceit.

Rossington Smith & Histed, for plaintiff in error.

Ellis, Cook & Ellis, for defendant in error.

MCELROY J. MAHAN, P. J. dissenting.

OPINION

MCELROY, J.:

This action was brought by defendant in error Swofford Brothers Dry-goods Company against Hargadine-McKittrick Dry-goods Company for the recovery of the amount due upon account for merchandise sold to A. R. Kramer, doing business under the firm name of A. R. Kramer & Co., the payment of which indebtedness was alleged to have been assumed by the Hargadine company as a part consideration for the purchase of a stock of goods, fixtures and appliances of trade. The defendant answered: (1) A general denial; (2) admitting the corporate existence of the plaintiff and of the defendant; (3) alleging that no consideration whatever was received by defendant for making any agreement or for the assumption of payment of the amount due plaintiff from Kramer & Co.; and (4) alleging that whatever promises were made for the payment of the mercantile indebtedness of Kramer & Co. by defendant were induced through the fraud of Kramer & Co., and were made in ignorance of the existence of any such indebtedness due to plaintiff.

The plaintiff's reply was a general denial. A trial was had to the court and a jury, resulting in a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $ 1078.05. A motion for a new trial was overruled, and judgment rendered upon the verdict. The defendant, as plaintiff in error, presents the record to this court for review, and alleges error in the proceedings of the trial court: First, that the court erred in excluding competent evidence; second, that the court erred in giving instructions to the jury and in refusing to give instructions requested.

The record shows that A. R. Kramer was engaged in the mercantile business at Galena, Kan., under the firm name of A. R. Kramer & Co.; that the Hargadine company is a wholesale mercantile company at St. Louis, Mo.; that the Swofford company is a wholesale mercantile house at Kansas City, Mo.; and that the McKittrick company and A. R. Kramer, on March 2, 1896, entered into the following agreement:

"This agreement, made this 2d day of March, 1896, between the Hargadine-McKittrick Dry-goods Company, of St. Louis, Mo., and A. R. Kramer, of Galena, Kan.:

"Witnesseth, that it is hereby understood and agreed that the stock of goods contained in the store house known as the Gill-Prehm block, situated in the city of Galena, Cherokee county, Kansas, and run under the firm style of A. R. Kramer & Co., (same being composed of A. R. Kramer individually,) is the sole property of said Hargadine-McKittrick Dry-goods Company, and to remain so until the following indebtedness, amounting to fourteen thousand nine hundred thirty-five dollars ($ 14,935.27) is paid. Same is evidenced by three promissory notes, one due January 1, 1897, for $ 5000, bearing interest at six per cent. per annum from date; one note dated March 2, 1896, and due one day after date, for $ 8431.24, without interest; one note dated March 2, 1896, and due one day after date, for $ 1504.03, with interest at the rate of six per cent. per annum -- all of said notes to be indorsed by Mrs. Lottie Kramer, wife of A. R. Kramer.

"It is further agreed that the said A. R. Kramer has the privilege of paying at any time whatever cash he may raise, on account of the note due January 1, 1897, for $ 5000.

"It is also agreed that the note for $ 8431.24, dated March 2, 1896, and due one day after date, is to be paid off out of the proceeds of the sales, after deducting expenses, etc.; and after invoicing the stock at the expiration of every six months, any balance that may remain to the credit of A. R. Kramer & Co. is to be applied to the payment of said note.

"It is further agreed that the note for $ 1504.03, dated March 2, 1896, and due one day after date, is to run one year, with privilege of renewing, but the interest on same is to be paid annually.

"It is further agreed that the said A. R. Kramer is to draw a salary not to exceed sixty-five dollars ($ 65) per month, and that the gross expense for conducting the business is not to exceed at any one time $ 300 per month or $ 3600 per year. The said A. R. Kramer is to make a weekly report to said Hargadine-McKittrick Dry-goods Company, showing amount of sales, cash on hand, expenditures for the week, and daily deposits of money received (all such deposits being the property of said Hargadine-McKittrick Dry-goods Company until the foregoing sums named are paid), and to make remittances weekly. The stock of merchandise is to be invoiced every six (6) months, same to be taken at actual cost.

"It is also further agreed that the said Hargadine-McKittrick Dry-goods Company is to grant the said A. R. Kramer & Co. a line of credit not to exceed $ 2000, as follows: $ 1500 in dry-goods, and $ 500 purchases made from other houses. No purchases are to be made or debt created without the authority of said Hargadine-McKittrick Dry-goods Company. All cash is to be remitted to the said Hargadine-McKittrick company, and all bills to be paid through them.

"It is also further agreed that, on the final payment of all said notes as mentioned in this agreement, the stock of merchandise is to be turned over to the said A. R. Kramer as his property. The said A. R. Kramer shall at any time have the privilege of taking up the entire debt due the said Hargadine-McKittrick Dry-goods Company.

"It is also agreed that the said Hargadine-Mc-Kittrick Dry-goods Company, through their representatives, is to have full access to the books and everything connected with the business at any time, without notice; and the expense incurred for such investigation to be defrayed by the said A. R. Kramer & Co.

"Upon the failure of said A. R. Kramer to carry out any part of the above agreement, it is hereby agreed that the said Hargadine-McKittick Dry-goods Company can at any time take possession of said stock of goods without notice.

"In witness whereof, we have hereunto set our hands and seal, this 7th day of March, 1896."

Pursuant to the agreement, Kramer managed the business, submitted weekly statements and other reports, remitted money, and at semiannual periods submitted what purported to be invoices with trial-balances, showing in detail the condition of the business, and the amount of stock on hand, with a list of creditors. The last of such semiannual statements submitted was on August 1, 1898. The business was unsatisfactory. In December, 1898, the Hargadine company determined to close out the business, and, with that end in view, wrote A. R. Kramer the following letter:

"ST LOUIS, MO., December 3, 1898.

"A. R. Kramer, Esq., Galena, Kan.: DEAR SIR -- We regret to say that we feel it is necessary for the protection of our interest that we should take possession of the stock of merchandise which we have been running under the agreement made March 2, 1896, in your name. You can readily see for yourself that the business is going behind every day, and will not support the expense of keeping it going. The expense lately appeared to be thirty-five or forty per cent. of the total sales, and, of course, you cannot begin to make that much profit, and the whole thing is daily getting worse. Mr. E. S. Purdy, one of our confidential employees, will be in Galena Monday morning, and you will be kind enough to turn the stock of goods to him. We have arranged to have the same packed up and shipped without delay. It is necessary for us to do this on rather short notice, as we have disposed of the goods and made arrangements to deliver them in time for the holiday trade.

"We feel that you have worked hard and faithfully to bring this unfortunate deal to a more satisfactory close, and are very sorry, indeed, that it has not turned out better. We do not, however, consider that you are responsible for the failure. We are willing to give you a clean receipt in full for all of your indebtedness to us on delivery of the stock of goods, and will, of course, return you all of your notes, which, I think, is all that you could expect under the circumstances.

"I regret that Mr. Davis was not able to go down to attend to this matter, as he has been familiar with it for so long, but his physician orders him not to go out of town for several days, and this matter will not keep. Mr. Davis, however, will be in Galena by the end of the week or the first of the following week, and settle up the whole matter with you.

"Mr Purdy is authorized to say to any one to whom...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT