Harjo v. State, 6 Div. 301
| Decision Date | 20 January 1981 |
| Docket Number | 6 Div. 301 |
| Citation | 395 So.2d 1104 |
| Parties | Billy Gene HARJO v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Albert C. Hultquist, Birmingham, for appellant.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Mark R. Ulmer, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
The defendant was indicted and convicted for the first degree murder of his mother-in-law, Bobbie Ingle Moore. Sentence was life imprisonment.
The only issue on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury's verdict of murder in the first degree.
In the early morning of September 12, 1979, Carolyn Louise Harjo was awakened by her mother's scream and a stinging in her chest. She had been shot in her sleep. She heard her mother, Bobbie Moore, screaming, "Don't shoot her again" and saw her husband, the defendant, standing next to her mother holding a pistol. Mrs. Harjo watched as the defendant pushed her mother away, took the weapon in both hands and shot her in the arm. The defendant then fired one shot into her father's room. Mrs. Harjo also heard a third shot.
Mrs. Moore's other daughter was in the house that night. Barbara Fernandez was awakened by a loud noise. She testified that when she walked into her parents' bedroom, the defendant "had already shot my daddy and my daddy was screaming at him not to shoot him any more and he was begging him not to shoot." Mrs. Fernandez stated that her father said,
When the defendant began shooting again, Mrs. Fernandez ran downstairs. The defendant followed and when he found her said, At the defendant's command, Mrs. Fernandez telephoned his mother in Oklahoma. The defendant got on the phone and told his mother, "I just killed Bobbie (the victim in this case), George (the victim's husband) and Carolyn (the defendant's wife)." The defendant then said "Come after Christy (his two year old child) because they won't take her away from me any more." After the telephone conversation, the defendant told Mrs. Fernandez to get him a pack of cigarettes and to "call the law and tell them to come after me and I'll be at the hill."
Mrs. Moore was the only victim to die from the wounds received that morning. Both Mr. Moore and the defendant's wife survived their injuries.
The defendant testified in his own behalf. He maintained that Mrs. Moore caught him in the act of attempting to take his life, tried to stop him, and during the struggle the pistol accidentally discharged four times. The testimony given by the defendant conflicted with that given by the witnesses for the State.
The pistol was a .327 magnum. It contained five shells,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Young v. State
...inferred from the fact that the defendant fired three shots from a pistol which killed two men and injured a third. Harjo v. State, 395 So.2d 1104 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, Ex parte Harjo, 395 So.2d 1105 The presumptions of intent and malice springing from the use of a deadly weapon were......
-
Thigpen v. Smith
...sentence. Under Alabama law, first degree murder is defined as willful, deliberate, malicious and premeditated killing. E.g., Harjo v. State, 395 So.2d 1104, 1105 (Ala.Crim. App.), cert. denied, 395 So.2d 1105 (Ala. 1981); Young v. State, 363 So.2d 1007, 1009 (1978). Premeditation and delib......
-
Toles v. State
...may be inferred from the character of the assault, the use of a deadly weapon and other attendant circumstances." See Harjo v. State, 395 So.2d 1104 (Ala.Cr.App.1981). Intent may be implied in the murder of Hale from the evidence indicating that the appellant intentionally shot at Butler. S......
-
Swann v. State
...sustains the jury's verdict of guilty as charged in the indictment. Code of Alabama, 1975, Sec. 13A-6-2-murder, supra; Harjo v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 395 So.2d 1104; Certiorari Denied, Ala., 395 So.2d There being no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is due to be, and is hereby......