Harkins v. Mitchell, 68312

Decision Date12 December 1995
Docket NumberNo. 68312,68312
CitationHarkins v. Mitchell, 911 S.W.2d 689 (Mo. App. 1995)
PartiesRichard HARKINS, Appellant, v. Cranston MITCHELL, Chairman of the Board of Probation and Parole, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Richard Harkins, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Frank A. Jung, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

KAROHL, Judge.

Harkins appeals the "dismissal" of his application for writ of mandamus. He was convicted of second degree murder and sentenced to life in prison in May, 1973. The Board of Probation and Parole (Board) granted him parole on July 20, 1984. His parole was revoked on January 8, 1993, because he unlawfully possessed a firearm. He was given another parole hearing November, 1993. The Board denied parole due to the nature and severity of the second degree murder offense and his conduct in possessing a firearm. The Board scheduled another parole hearing for November 1995.

After the November 1993 hearing, Harkins discovered his step-daughter wrote a letter to the Board asking to deny him parole. He requested the Board "expunge" the letter from his file and give him a new hearing. The Board denied his request. Harkins then filed an application for a writ of mandamus with the Circuit Court of St. Francois County. The purpose of the application for the writ was to obtain an order that the letter be "expunged" from his file and that a new parole hearing be held. The court dismissed the application for writ of mandamus because Harkins failed (1) to state grounds for relief and (2) to demonstrate that the denial of parole adversely prejudiced him.

No appeal lies from a...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • State ex rel. Mid-Missouri Limestone, Inc. v. County of Callaway
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • February 24, 1998
    ...Inc., and Mertens Construction Co., Inc.'s remedy is a direct application for writ of mandamus to a higher court. Harkins v. Mitchell, 911 S.W.2d 689, 690 (Mo.App.1995). Appeal dismissed as to Point Point II--Legal Standing In Point II, Appellants assert that the trial court erred in sustai......
  • State ex rel. Amer. Eagle v. St. Louis Cty
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • October 21, 2008
    ...The general rule is that no appeal lies from the dismissal or the denial of a petition for writ of mandamus. See Harkins v. Mitchell, 911 S.W.2d 689, 690 (Mo. App. E.D.1995) (holding no appeal permitted from dismissal of writ petition); State ex rel. Ashby Road Partners, LLC v. State Tax Co......