Harman v.Apfel, 98-35780

Decision Date04 May 2000
Docket NumberNo. 98-35780,98-35780
Citation203 F.3d 1151
Parties(9th Cir. 2000) HALRAY HARMAN,Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner ORDER AND of the Social Security AMENDED Administration,OPINION Defendant-Appellee
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

NOTE: SEE AMENDED OPINION AT 211 F.3d 1172.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Harman v. Apfel
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • May 4, 2000
    ...Circuit Judges, and Jeremy Fogel,1 District Judge. ORDER The Opinion filed February 17, 2000, slip op. 1915, and appearing at 203 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2000), is amended as At slip op. 1922, delete the first paragraph under "II" up to footnote "4" and replace with the following: It is settled......
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Bohr's Social Security Issues Annotated - Volume II
    • May 4, 2015
    ..., 945 F.2d 1482, 1491 (10th Cir. 1991), §§ 105.8, 107.12, 107.16, 202.9, 204.6, 205.7, 205.8, 206.1, 210.3, 210.5, 606.3 Harman v. Apfel, 203 F.3d 1151, 1158-59 (9th Cir. 2000), § 607.1 Harman v. Apfel, 211 F.3d 1172, 1179-80 (9th Cir. 2000), 3d-10, 9th-10, §§ 1307, 1604.11 Harmison v. Halt......
  • Federal court issues
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Social Security Issues Annotated. Vol. II - 2014 Contents
    • August 3, 2014
    ...by remanding this matter for further proceedings.” Mendoza v. Apfel , 88 F. Supp.2d 1108, 1115 (C.D. Cal. 2000), citing Harman v. Apfel , 203 F.3d 1151, 1158-59 (9 th Cir. 2000); Reddick v. Chater , 157 F.3d 715, 729-30 (9 th Cir. 1998). Thus, the court reversed and remanded for an award of......
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Social Security Issues Annotated. Vol. II - 2014 Contents
    • August 3, 2014
    ..., 945 F.2d 1482, 1491 (10th Cir. 1991), §§ 105.8, 107.12, 107.16, 202.9, 204.6, 205.7, 205.8, 206.1, 210.3, 210.5, 606.3 Harman v. Apfel, 203 F.3d 1151, 1158-59 (9th Cir. 2000), § 607.1 Harman v. Apfel, 211 F.3d 1172, 1179-80 (9th Cir. 2000), 3d-10, 9th-10, §§ 1307, 1604.11 Harmison v. Halt......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT