Harmon v. Bowers

Decision Date09 May 1908
Docket Number15,553
Citation78 Kan. 135,96 P. 51
PartiesJOHN R. HARMON v. FREDERICK BOWERS
CourtKansas Supreme Court

Decided January, 1908.

Error from Cowley district court; CARROLL L. SWARTS, judge.

Judgment affirmed.

SYLLABUS

SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.

1. CIVIL RIGHTS--Suspension--Imprisonment. The suspension of the civil rights of a person sentenced to the penitentiary for a term less than life begins at the date of his imprisonment under the sentence.

2. DEEDS--Executed Pending a Stay of Execution of a Sentence of Imprisonment. A sentence to the penitentiary for a term of years does not make void a conveyance duly executed by the convict before he is imprisoned under the sentence and while execution of the judgment of conviction is stayed by proceedings upon appeal to the supreme court.

3. DEEDS--Delivery--Escrow. The manual deposit of a deed with a third party, to receive and hold for the grantee with intent thereby to give it effect as a conveyance and to place it beyond the custody and control of the grantors, with a declared or manifest purpose of making a present transfer of title, is a sufficient delivery.

A. M. Jackson, A. L. Noble, and L. C. Brown, for plaintiff in error.

C. T. Atkinson, C. R. Pollard, G. H. Buckman, and S. C. Bloss, for defendant in error.

OPINION

BENSON, J.:

On March 5, 1904, John R. Harmon was the owner of a tract of land in Cowley county, Kansas, upon which he and his wife resided as a homestead. On the same day he was convicted of a crime in the district court of that county, and on April 12, 1904, he was sentenced to the penitentiary. He appealed to the supreme court, where the judgment was affirmed December 1, 1904. From the time of his sentence, April 12, 1904, until January 19, 1905, John R. Harmon was at liberty under bond, but on January 19, 1905, he was taken to the penitentiary, where he remained until January 12, 1906, when he was pardoned and discharged.

After his conviction and sentence in the district court, but before he was taken to the penitentiary, Harmon and his wife, Lucinda W. Harmon, made a deed of the homestead to John R. Simpson and Ella Simpson, which was placed in the hands of R. A. Gilmer, to be delivered to Simpson for the benefit of Mrs. Harmon. On March 5, 1905, Fred Bowers negotiated with Mrs. Harmon for the purchase of the land, upon which she still resided, and the deed was thereupon executed to him by John R. Simpson and wife. The consideration for this deed was $ 500 cash, the payment of taxes, and the release of prior debts of Harmon and wife to Bowers, which were liens upon the land. Some time in the summer of 1905 Mrs. Harmon died, leaving in the possession of John R. Simpson $ 297, part of the money received by her from Fred Bowers, to be delivered to Mr. Harmon when he should be released from the penitentiary, which was done.

This action was brought by Harmon against Bowers to recover the land, and for rents and profits. The judgment was for the defendant, and the plaintiff asks for a reversal. The plaintiff claims (1) that on account of his disability as a convict he was unable to make a legal transfer of his realty during the time he was under sentence but at liberty under bond, and (2) that the deed which he made to John R. Simpson, in which his wife joined, had never been legally delivered.

Section 2301 of the General Statutes of 1901 reads as follows:

"A sentence of confinement and hard labor for a term less than life suspends all civil rights of the person so sentenced during the term thereof."

It is necessary to determine when the term of imprisonment referred to in this statute begins. The defendant having appealed to this court from the judgment of conviction and sentence, and having given bond as provided by law, execution of the judgment was stayed, as provided in chapter 389 of the Laws of 1903. Another statute provides for the appointment of a trustee to take charge of and manage the estate of a person imprisoned in the penitentiary for a term less than life, but such appointment can not be made until satisfactory evidence is given that the convict is actually imprisoned. (Crim. Code, §§ 337, 338.) From these provisions it appears that civil rights are not suspended until the convict is imprisoned. If we should hold that civil rights are suspended the moment sentence is pronounced the defendant's punishment would be increased by taking away his civil rights for an indefinite period in excess of the term of imprisonment, which does not begin until the stay allowed upon appeal has expired and he is imprisoned, or, possibly, when he is in custody to be conveyed to the penitentiary.

"If, after sentence has been pronounced, no appeal is taken, the conviction is complete, and its consequences attach and operate at once. But if an appeal be prosecuted, the effect of the appeal is to suspend and hold in abeyance the enforcement and legal consequences of the conviction until the judgment of the court of last resort has affirmed the conviction had in the trial court." ( Arcia v. The State, 26 Tex. Ct. App. 193, 205, 9 S.W. 685.)

The period of confinement and hard labor referred to in section 2301 of the General Statutes of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • State ex rel. Olson v. Langer, 6288.
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • September 28, 1934
    ...of $100 but also that part of the judgment imposing the penalty of a vacancy in office. In the case of Harmon v. Bowers, 78 Kan. 135, 96 P. 51, 17 L. R. A. (N. S.) 502, 16 Ann. Cas. 121, the Kansas court held that under the statutes of Kansas the defendant Harmon's civil rights were not sus......
  • State, Relation of Olson v. Langer
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • September 19, 1934
    ... ... judgment imposing the penalty of a vacancy in office ...          In the ... case of Harmon v. Powers, 78 Kan. 135, 96 P. 51, 17 ... L.R.A.(N.S.) 502, 16 Ann. Cas. 121, the Kansas Court held ... that under the statutes of Kansas the ... ...
  • Hoard v. Jones
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • July 11, 1925
    ...Rutherford, 95 Kan. 152, 147 P. 805; Wuester v. Folin, 60 Kan. 334, 56 P. 490; Young v. McWilliams, 75 Kan. 243, 89 P. 12; Harmon v. Bowers, 78 Kan. 135, 96 P. 51; v. Collins, 81 Kan. 33, 105 P. 26; Elliott v. Hoffhine, 97 Kan. 26, 154 P. 225.) With this view we should not reverse the case ......
  • Hush v. Reeder
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • November 10, 1939
    ... ... 530, 1 Am.St.Rep. 237; Wuester v ... Folin, 60 Kan. 334, 56 P. 490; Nolan v. Otney, ... 75 Kan. 311, 89 P. 690, 9 L.R.A.,N.S., 317; Harmon v ... Bowers, 78 Kan. 135, 96 P. 51, 17 L.R.A.,N.S., 502, 16 ... Ann.Cas. 121; Norton v. Collins, 81 Kan. 33, 105 P ... 26; Worth v. Butler, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT