Haro v. City of Los Angeles
| Docket Number | 12-55062,12-55310,12-55076,12-55303 |
| Decision Date | 18 March 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
55 cases
-
Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLC
...is to be construed liberally in favor of employees [and] exemptions are narrowly construed against employers." Haro v. City of Los Angeles , 745 F.3d 1249, 1256 (9th Cir. 2014) (citation omitted). The majority points to two recent Supreme Court cases which held that the narrow-construction ......
-
Ader v. Simonmed Imaging Inc.
...mandatory if Plaintiffs prove actual damages. "Double damages are the norm; single damages are the exception." Haro v. City of Los Angeles , 745 F.3d 1249, 1259 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Chao , 346 F.3d at 920 ).E. Statute of Limitations The parties cross-move for summary judgment on the issu......
-
Howell v. Advantage RN, LLC
...938, 941 (8th Cir. 2008) ). Consequently, "[d]ouble damages are the norm; single damages are the exception." Haro v. City of Los Angeles , 745 F.3d 1249, 1259 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Chao v. A-One Med. Servs., Inc. , 346 F.3d 908, 920 (9th Cir. 2003) ). In fact, "[l]iquidated damages are ‘m......
-
Cheung v. United States
...allows for a cumulative offset or whether damages must be calculated on a workweek by workweek basis. See Haro v. City of Los Angeles, 745 F.3d 1249, 1255 (9th Cir. 2014) ("While the Sixth and Seventh Circuits have ruled that a week-by-week offset must be used [to offset other types of prem......
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
§ 3.2.13 THE WORKWEEK.
...in misclassification case, but using identical mathematical formula to calculate damages based on binding Supreme Court precedent). [91] 745 F.3d 1249 (9th Cir....
-
§ 3.2.3 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.
...as amended 29 U.S.C. § 251.[13] 29 U.S.C. § 255(a).[14] McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co., 486 U.S. 128 (1988); Haro v. City of L.A. Corp., 745 F.3d 1249 (9th Cir....
-
Wage and Hour Update
...See Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842 (1984).37. Id. at 843.38. Haro v. City of Los Angeles, 745 F.3d 1249, 1256 (9th Cir. 2014).39. Solis v. Washington, 656 F.3d 1079, 1083 (9th Cir. 2011).40. CHW W. Bay v. Thompson, 246 F.3d 1218, 1223 (9th Cir....
-
Public Sector Case Notes
...sector.FIRE FIGHTERS FLSA Fire Fighter Exemption Not Applicable to Dispatchers and Aeromedical Technicians Haro v. City of Los Angeles, 745 F.3d 1249 (9th Cir. 2014) The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) exempts fire fighters from overtime for work beyond forty hours in one work week. Fire fi......
Get Started for Free