Harper v. Roberts

Decision Date01 October 1853
Citation22 Pa. 194
PartiesHarper versus Roberts.
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Ewing and Kaine, for plaintiff in error.

J. B. and A. Howell, for defendant in error.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

KNOX, J.

In these cases, certain facts were submitted to the Court below for their opinion, without any provision that judgment should be entered for either party.

The Court gave an opinion in favor of the defendant, but entered no judgment. This writ of error is taken; but to what? Not to the judgment, for there is none. It will not lie to the opinion, and hence we must dismiss it.

It seems that the parties desired the advice of the learned judge below, and he has given it to them. If they are dissatisfied with it, they had better proceed to a trial of their cause. It is ordered that the writ of error be quashed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Commonwealth v. Howard
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • May 23, 1892
    ... ... appellee. -- The quashing of the case stated was an ... interlocutory judgment from which no appeal lies: Harper ... v. Roberts, 22 Pa. 194; Hughes's Adm'r v ... Peaslee, 50 Pa. 257; Davis v. Barr, 5 S. & R ... 515; Klopp v. Bernville Live Stock Ins. Co., 1 ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT